Acceptance after major revisions, a total period of nearly 3 months, 4 reviewers. 20200424 submitted; 20200425 Editor Assignment Pending; 20200501 Editor Assignment Pending; 20200503 Under Review; 20200507 Under Review; 20200608 Reviews Completed; 20200609 Reviews Completed; 20200609 Major Revision; 20200629 Revision Submitted; 20200629 Editor Assignment Pending; 20200701 Editor Assignment Pending; 20200701 Under Review; 20200702 Under Review; 20200705 Under Review; 20200720 Accept.

(12) Thank | 大石头

2019.12.4 Submission; 2019.12.24 Editor pre-review, letting us compare with the latest method. It seems the result of editor pre-review is the same response for most people who submitted to this journal. I added the time and the name of the meeting for the methods in the comparisons in the first version, such as CVPR2019. 2019.12.27 Revision for the pre-review was submitted. 2020.3.1 The first review ended with minor revision required. There were three reviewers, but with no substantive opinions, only including issues such as citing more references, the diagram being not clear enough, and more details to be explained, etc. So basically there was no modification. 2020.3.8 Revision for the first review was submitted. 2020.5.18 Accepted. I feel that in my situation, there should be results within half a month. But we waited for more than two months. It may because of the epidemic, but I also blamed myself for being too lazy to remind them... The point is that although the minor revision was sent for review, we did not get any comments from the reviewers. Based on previous experience, it felt abnormal, and it might have been delayed for two months... It was suspected that it was due to the epidemic. The reviewers did not review the manuscripts. The editor couldn't wait anymore, and seeing that there were no problems, he directly accepted it. It feels quite simple for the overall process. the submission process is fairly formal, but I haven't learned much.

(36) Thank | 嘻嘻哈哈yjy

I submitted two papers relating to machine learning to this journal this year. Paper 1: Submitted in early January, rejected on March 1 (The opinions of 2 reviewers returned. Reviewer 1 had no substantive suggestions. Reviewer 2 made very detailed comments, and rejected the manuscript because he/she questioned that the concepts of classification and clustering were not clear in the article). After modifying this manuscript, I transferred it to another journal and it was accepted already. Paper 2: It was submitted on June 5 and the initial review comments returned on August 1. Major revisions were required and there were 3 reviewers. Except for reviewer 2 who recommended acceptance directly, the other two reviewers made very detailed comments, approximately 10 each. The revised manuscript was submitted on August 22. The comments of second review were received on September 14. It would be accepted after minor revisions. In addition to the last three reviewers, two newly added reviewers had few comments. The revised manuscript was submitted on September 16. The decision to acceptance was received by email on September 25. Based on the two experiences, the turnaround time for initial review of the journal was approximately 2 months. The review speed was fast, especially for the second and third reviews. The editor was very responsible. There were also quite a lot of reviewers (5 in total). Speed was very fast. What a conscience journal!

(15) Thank | 小瓶子132

Excuse me, have you asked ur yet?

(0) Thank | fuhengyi

7088
Delivered on 7.28
WE on 7.30

(0) Thank | 冬枣

Switch to ASME or IEEE, this one is too unreliable. It not only takes a long time to transfer, but also wastes time.

(0) Thank | serry

Hello, I am using the official LaTeX and I feel that the layout is very rough. The page width is too narrow, causing tables to overflow. Additionally, my document has reached 28 pages and the font in the template does not match the font used in the journal. This is causing me some distress. Also, can I insert images in PDF format? Thank you for your reply!

(0) Thank | 库库操作

Boss, please provide the Word template, thank you very much!!! 931342672@qq.com

(0) Thank | zyj111zyj

Have you been busy, brother?

(0) Thank | fuhengyi

It has been three weeks since we started.

(0) Thank | fuhengyi

When did you submit your application?

(0) Thank | amei1

After changing the date once, I urinated within two days.

(0) Thank | Tianna11

After submission, it only took a couple of days for the status to change to "we," and it remained that way until the end of June. Although the dates during which it was "we" changed, the status remained the same.

(0) Thank | Tianna11

Still with the editor.

(0) Thank | 终会路左相逢

May I ask what your current status is?

(0) Thank | yangzeyu2

Could you please let me know the current status?

(0) Thank | yangzeyu2

Can you please let me know the current status? I have also submitted my application.

(0) Thank | yangzeyu2

7.16提交
7.17我们

(0) Thank | 终会路左相逢

My paper was changed to "we" on May 11th, updated once on June 22nd, and still remains as "we" up to now. I have reminded twice in between, what is going on?

(0) Thank | amei1

Have you ever changed the date between "we" and "ur"?

(0) Thank | amei1

Similarly, I am still in WE.

(0) Thank | XiaoQi

5.1 submitted
6.30 UR
It is already 7.26 and still in UR, too slow, isn't it?

(0) Thank | 天天0705

We both submitted our work around the same time, and I am still waiting for a response.

(0) Thank | fuhengyi

7.7 提交
7.11 我们

(0) Thank | XiaoQi

Will rejection be sent to the author by email like the submission was just made?

(0) Thank | 三生三世十里桃花