I submitted a paper to this journal, and after a month the editor found a single reviewer. Unfortunately, my manuscript was rejected based on this one reviewer’s comments. Apparently, my research, which focused on the development of a chemical catalyst for making biodiesel, was outside the scope of ABAB. Make sure to check that your research falls in line with the scope of this journal prior to submission.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Is the Sister magazine popular? How are you doing now?

(0) Thank | layna

The fresh graduate's application was rejected directly within two days

(0) Thank | Ning

I submitted it in March, but I don't know what the status is now. It is still under review

(0) Thank | CalvinHe

The requirements are not high, but very slow, very slow

(0) Thank | 微风

Submitted for half a year, then undergo major revisions, and then start looking for reviewers to review again. It's too slow!!!!

(0) Thank | ygllong

6.7 Submission;
6.13 Review;
7.17 Major revision after review comments, revised on 8.6;
8.14 Second revision, revised on 8.16;
8.27 Comments for third revision; revised on 8.29
09.16 Accepted 
Overall, the editors and reviewers were very nice. They provided specific comments and even suggestions on how to make improvements, which was great

(0) Thank | dddddddd147

I have submitted several times, the difficulty is relatively low, mainly in the field of biological materials, microbial fermentation, etc. Some editors may find it a preferred field, and the processing speed feels very fast.

(0) Thank | kubiosci

The first editor rejected the review after submission, and then another editor was assigned. Approximately two weeks later, it was sent for review, and it took one month for external review feedback to come back with minor revisions. It was returned one week later, and accepted one week after that. It felt quite fast. My research paper has a large word count and data volume, so there are fewer options for suitable journals to submit to. This journal seems to be quite inclusive and accommodating, and the speed is not slow either. This may depend on the editor. I hope everyone can encounter efficient editors.

(3) Thank | ououou

I have been waiting for more than half a year for the approval, and it is still under external review.

(0) Thank | 愤怒的小祥

Seeing other people's submission process, it's really slow.

(0) Thank | abubu1444

After the submission on April 17th, it was accepted on May 14th. It was revised once in the middle. The reviewer proposed two opinions. After the editor returned the comments, he was acceptd after minor modification.The main thing is to do the data well. The English writing of the article should be passed, and there should be no obvious mistakes, so the probability of employment is large.

(1) Thank | 1285136911@qq.com

this journal is free, but the efficiency is very low.After submitting the manuscript in May 2014, it has been assigned to the editorial status after the submission, and the mail has not been returned.In December 2015, it became the status of trial, and it was repaired after three months and received at the end of May.The efficiency is too low, comrades who are eager to accept, please detour.In addition, emailing the editor does not reply....

(0) Thank | luowei

Does this journal have a page fee?More money

(0) Thank | ccl103@163.com

. Everyone says slow, I thinkMy okay, the draft submitted at the end of November last year, accepted in 3 months, minor repairs.The English requirements are really not high, the editing is very good, and the grammar will be modified, but the level of the revision is really not flattering. In some places, I changed it back after seeing it.

(2) Thank | catty5082003@163.com

contributed on December 5, 2012, overhauled on February 18, 2013, revised draft on March 5, designated editor on March 11, received on March 16, and Marched on to production on March 18.The overall feeling is: the workload is large, the amount of data should be rich.The entire experimental design should be complete, something new and better.The requirements for writing in English are not high.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

just received an article, a total of 3 months, very fast, value the workload...

(0) Thank | Anonymous

super bad super slow, more than 50 submissionsDays, all arranged for editing, and then waited for 10 days to say that the editor said that the experimental design method used in the paper was not the most novel, and directly refused.And the other advantages and innovations in the article are not mentioned at all.I wrote a letter in the middle and asked about the status of the manuscript. I even changed an editorial review.I suggest that you don't select, but the truth is not a good journal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is too slow, in the state of editor assignment pending for up to 61 days, then edited assigned, the current state is already 20 days, has not changed, anxious friends do not choose thisThe journal is too slow, it has been nearly three months, and has not been submitted for review

(0) Thank | Anonymous

It’s really slow, the submission is 28 days, the status is still Editor Assignment Pending, etc.It’s really anxious

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I heard that it’s super slow, but the insurance is really worthy of the name. After 6 months, I gave it to Xiao Xiu. After returning to the editor one week later, I immediately assigned it to the editor.Accepted.I saw that I took 5 tablets before accepting one in our lab.I feel that the initial review of the editor directly wipes a large part.The wrong direction is one of the main reasons for rejection.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted in mid-March, major revise in early May, received on May 10, I feel that the editing process is faster, the innovation requirements are not high, but the data is required to be sufficient.Suitable for general experimental results

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review speed is OK, the requirements are not very high, and it is easier to receive.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal reviews the super junk, three months and so on, two sentences, similar to our Chinese periodicals, Korean sticks!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review is slower. It may be because there are too few reviewers listed. It is recommended to list several reviewers to speed up.The editor is more responsible, the article requires a certain amount of work and detailed data.

(0) Thank | Anonymous