Submitted on February 15. Rejected on April 3. Two reviewers. One approved it and the other rejected it. It was amazing.

(1) Thank | lch608

The efficiency is too poor; 2020-2-15 submission; 2020-2-25 external review; 2020-3-4 external review update; 2020-3-13 update again, with editor; It's almost a month, and the editor just can't make a decision... Is he isolated?

(2) Thank | lch608

I submitted it on May 20, it was with editor for one month, and it was under review for one month and a half. It was with editor for 11 days again. Can I send an email to ask about the situation, thank you for your answer!

(3) Thank | 小妍

Just submitted and found a similarity rate of 32%, now it is "Decision in Process", crying...

(0) Thank | HEJJ

I directly used the author-date format that comes with Endnote.

(0) Thank | 留云曼吟

Hello, may I ask how often there are updates with the editor?

(0) Thank | 逍遥听荷

I change them one by one

(0) Thank | 碧水思天

You are precious to me

(0) Thank | 碧水思天

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 The research direction is embryonic experience sharing: The opinions were returned two weeks after submission, with 40 very big issues, and one month was given for revisions. It was extremely difficult to complete, almost completely reanalyzing all of the original data. When resubmitted, both reviewers were very satisfied and gave a "Very well done" comment, and it was accepted in two weeks. From submission to acceptance only took three months, which is considered quite fast. The harvest was very large, the reviewers asked questions very professionally. This was the first time doing clinical research, and the initial draft had some basic knowledge errors, but the reviewers patiently pointed these out one by one, and the editor gave the opportunity for responses and revisions. Grateful

(0) Thank | 东海箫吟

The submission was rejected after 3 months of review. The feedback received upon return feels overly nitpicky. Our research group has previously submitted to this journal, and it took 3 months from submission to publication. It seems that luck plays a significant role in this as well.

(0) Thank | 投稿幸运

How is the anticipation going?

(0) Thank | 碧水思天

Research objective clarifies the research background and explains why this research is conducted. It is a necessary element in writing an abstract

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Abstracts include some common key elements, each part is about one or two sentences, such as background, aim or purpose of research, method used, findings/results, and conclusion

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to write an abstract? Is there a template?

(0) Thank | 陶宜三岁啦

Does the abstract need to include the research objectives?

(0) Thank | 八坂篷蔚

The instructions for authors cannot be opened, I don't know what's wrong

(0) Thank | 筑阳舒婕

The slowest magazine I have ever submitted to, with the editor taking a whole month, without giving a clear response whether it was rejected or under review. I strongly do not recommend it, very frustrating.

(0) Thank | yang1984

Hello, I couldn't find the reference output format for this journal in EndNote. Should I update them one by one?

(0) Thank | 小天巧吖

Excuse me, senior, is the layout fee expensive?

(0) Thank | 终幕美华

Review Speed: 2.0
Experience Sharing: Submitted on 2-15, received reviews on 4-3, two rejections and one acceptance. So drunk

(0) Thank | 桃花秋梓

Efficiency is too low; submitted on 2020-2-15; external review on 2-25; external review updated on 3-4; updated again on 3-13, with editor; it's been almost a month, the editor just can't make a decision... Are we being isolated = =

(0) Thank | 落雁歌韵

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: Submitted extracellular vesicle sequencing article, rejected in 5 days. Efficiency is acceptable

(0) Thank | 东京靖薇

How does the editor check the data? Do you need the original data?

(0) Thank | 瑞珺来了

I submitted a meta, the content is relatively simple. It was rejected the next day, but the efficiency is still acceptable

(0) Thank | 稻妻古韵