Although the impact factor is not high, I feel that in the overall review process, the reviewers and editors have given a lot of valuable comments seriously. For the first review, a major revision was required. Based on the reviewers’ comments, a comprehensive revision was made. It is equivalent to rewriting, which took a month. Then two minor revisions were made. Generally speaking, I think it is still very good. I hope that the impact factor will be raised in the future!

(0) Thank | Angelia526

What's going on? Encountered a bug when submitting the article, getting this Http failure response for https://apitaylorandfrancis.com/v1/authclient/individual at the fourth step: 400 OK. What should I do?

(0) Thank | tian

The article was submitted in December 2024, and feedback was received approximately a month later. There were a total of 2 reviewers, and their feedback was very similar, indicating that both reviewers identified the same issues. The feedback provided was professional, and the magazine gave a two-week deadline for revisions. I wrote to the magazine requesting an extension for the revisions, which they agreed to. After one month of revisions, the article was resubmitted. About a month later, minor revisions were requested, and I made the necessary changes as per the reviewers' requests. The article was accepted after approximately 3 weeks, and overall the process was fairly efficient.

(0) Thank | 月下人静

May I ask when can we expect the results to be available for review?

(0) Thank | 小刘爱科研

How long does it take for review? Is it normal that it has been a month and still "with editor"?

(0) Thank | 努力啊大代玉

With your sharing, I feel more confident for my next submission.

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

Isn't the review period supposed to be 3 months? How did it become 6 months?

(0) Thank | cuihhua

Three months after submission, the review results were received. Due to significant differences in opinions from the first two reviewers, the editor invited a third reviewer. Fortunately, the third reviewer provided a very positive feedback, and after incorporating the suggestions from the editor, a major revision was required. After six weeks of revision, the manuscript was resubmitted for the second round of review. The second review process took approximately two weeks before further revisions were requested. After resubmitting, the manuscript entered the third round of review and was accepted one week later.

The entire process from submission to acceptance took six months. The editor and reviewers demonstrated professionalism and responsibility, and their responses to emails were timely. The review process was well-organized. Highly recommended.

(0) Thank | liuxh777

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: The review speed is relatively fast, and the manuscript was returned for major revision in less than 3 months after submission. Because the opinions of the first two reviewers were quite divergent, a third reviewer was sought. Fortunately, the third reviewer's comments were more positive, and after the chief editor also provided corresponding modification suggestions, a major revision was granted. Due to the large workload, a delay notice was sent to the editor two weeks after the revisions. The revised manuscript was submitted one and a half months later for a second review. After 2 weeks, revision suggestions were returned, and the manuscript was submitted again after further modifications. Acceptance was received 10 days after the third review. The process from submission to acceptance took 6 months. The comments from the editor and reviewers were very professional, and the process was very standardized. Looking forward to Renal Failure getting better and better.

(0) Thank | 东风谷殿原

Submit your manuscript according to the author guidelines, but I forgot the specific details.

(0) Thank | 华山晴文

Is everything okay? Did you receive it?

(0) Thank | 华山晴文

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Emphasized research direction: Nephrology
Experience sharing: Come back to the forum after publication. After three months since the first submission, many reminders were sent before finally sending it out for external review. The external review came back in a week, with feedback from four reviewers: 1 rejection, 1 major revision, 2 minor revisions, and finally a chance for revision. After revising, feedback on minor revisions from the original reviewer came back after 3 weeks, followed by quick proofreading and publication. In summary, the journal's requirements were not very high, and the formatting was not strictly followed when submitting. Changes were only required during the revision process, and the editor did not provide much feedback throughout. Once the reviewers agreed to publication, the paper was accepted. It feels like the editor is more inclined to accept submissions. It's just unclear why it took so long for the external review to be conducted. Those with sufficient time can give it a try.

(0) Thank | 暴风风芹

The review process was slightly long, taking 5 months from submission to acceptance. There were four reviewers and a few issues, with a month given for revisions. After major revisions and a second review, the paper was accepted. The publication fee is $2990, which is a bit expensive.

(0) Thank | 中论文

Hello, is it normal for a decision pending for 3 days after being revised?

(0) Thank | 西行寺灵卉

When submitting a manuscript, should Figures be uploaded separately? If Figures are included in the Manuscript, the file size will exceed 128M. If Figures are uploaded separately, what category should be selected (Supplementary materials)?

(0) Thank | 佳杰三岁啦

When submitting a manuscript, should Figures be uploaded separately? If Figures are included in the Manuscript, the size will exceed 128M. If Figures are uploaded separately, what category should be selected (Supplementary materials?)

(0) Thank | 佳杰三岁啦

When submitting a manuscript, should Figures be uploaded separately? If Figures are included in the Manuscript, the file size will exceed 128M. If Figures are uploaded separately, what category should be selected (Supplementary materials)?

(0) Thank | 佳杰三岁啦

When submitting a manuscript, should Figures be uploaded separately? If Figures are included in the Manuscript, the file size will exceed 128M. If Figures are uploaded separately, what category should be selected (Supplementary materials)?

(0) Thank | 佳杰三岁啦

When submitting a manuscript, should Figures be uploaded separately? If Figures are included in the Manuscript, the file size will exceed 128M. If Figures are uploaded separately, what category should be selected (Supplementary materials)?

(0) Thank | 佳杰三岁啦

Often like this, this webpage can only wait.

(0) Thank | 半月廷谦

Could you please tell me how much the layout fee is？

(0) Thank | 彝断李

You can see it by clicking on submit again.

(0) Thank | 华山晴文

Where can I see the progress of my submission in this magazine? I submitted it but I can't see my article.

(0) Thank | 法慧越泽

Where can I see the progress of my submission in this magazine? I submitted it but can't see my article.

(0) Thank | 法慧越泽

Excuse me, where can I see the progress of my submissions in this magazine? I submitted my article but I can't see it.

(0) Thank | 法慧越泽