The impact factor is not high, but the impact in the radiation circle is still very good, especially when the experimental material is a plant-focused topic, it is basically the best.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I gave a lot of comments on the manuscript, submitted it in early July, and got rejected at the end of October. It feels like the sky is falling. The journal is very professional, so good luck to everyone. Be cautious when submitting to this journal, as it took 4 months for the review process.

(0) Thank | happening

Research focus: radiation injury; experience sharing on radiation injury: submitted on June 29th, still at the first step and has not been assigned an editor yet, the efficiency is so slow.

(0) Thank | 燃木振荣

How long after submission did you get the revision?

(0) Thank | 墟散嘉珍

Research focus: Bioinformatics sequencing; Experience sharing on radiation damage: How long does it take to get feedback after submission? It has been nearly 5 weeks since submission and it is still under review

(0) Thank | 墟散嘉珍

Submitted in December 2020, rejected in April 2021, the review process was extremely long. The junior colleague in our group had also submitted before and experienced a very slow response.

(0) Thank | li011

Hello, may I ask how long it took for the minor revisions to come back after submitting this article?

(0) Thank | 莎拉贾尔斯

Why has it been almost a month since the minor revisions with the editor, is this normal?

(0) Thank | 宗室乐松

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Research focus: Radiological injury Experience sharing: I would like to ask everyone, does everyone who submits to this journal have animal experiments? The second round of revisions gave feedback requiring animal model data. It's really hard to graduate. If I tell the editor that I can't provide the data, will they just reject it?

(0) Thank | 四象安儿

Do you charge a layout fee? How much is it?

(0) Thank | Harry Agnes

Choose the issues to be discussed in depth; discuss the selected issues from multiple perspectives in a certain order, with reasoning based on facts, clear and thorough explanations

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Emphasize the originality of your research, showing distinctive characteristics different from others. The magnitude of the difference is another issue, the important thing is to have a distinction. As long as there is a distinction, it is considered innovation

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to Highlight the Novelty of an Article in a Discussion?

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

What is a profound discussion and how to deepen the discussion?

(0) Thank | 北国博达

Hello, do you know if this magazine accepts case studies?

KWang on August 2, 2014: 
Acceptance rate: about 50%
Review time: about 2 months
Today when I opened the submission system, I found that the editor-in-chief of the magazine asked me to make minor revisions to the article (such as some tenses, etc.) and then it can be accepted. I feel very excited, this should be my second SCI paper during my master's degree. The review time is now announced for everyone's reference:
Potential Associate Editor Assigned 2014-07-21 
Potential Associate Editor Accept 2014-07-21 
Associate Editor Assigned 2014-07-21 
Associate Editor Decision Started 2014-07-29 
Associate Editor Decision Completed 2014-07-29 
On August 1st, the editor's opinion was to make minor revisions. Hurry up and make the changes. Good luck!

Date: 2014-08-01 
Last Sent: 2014-08-01 
Triggered By: Redacted 
BCC: Redacted 
Subject: Decision Letter 
Message: Dear Dr. ***:
Your manuscript "********************************" (RR****R) has been reviewed by the reviewers and Associate Editor, who feel that the paper will be acceptable for publication in Radiation Research with some minor revisions and clarifications.
I am enclosing copies of the reviews, which I hope you will find to be constructive and helpful as you prepare your revised manuscript. 
Please note that the journal's reference list format now follows that of the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (BMJ Vancouver style of referencing), which can be found on the website of the National Library of Medicine (www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/uniform_requirements.html). The reference numbers should be italicized. Please make sure that your references are in this format when you submit your revised paper.
We look forward to the rapid receipt of your revised manuscript. Please submit with the revised manuscript a response to the reviews that numbers the reviewers' comments and outlines your responses or the revisions that have been made in the manuscript. You may also wish to include a manuscript marked to show the changes that have been made; this will expedite the review of the revised manuscript.
The revised manuscript should be submitted online through the journal's AllenTrack website.
We thank you for submitting your paper to Radiation Research.
Sincerely,
Marc S. Mendonca, Ph.D.
Editor-in-Chief
Radiation Research

(0) Thank | 华山红霞

2016 IF: 2.539. Ranking: 24/84 (Biology), 35/72 (Biophysics), 39/126 (Radiology

(0) Thank | 努力啊大代阳

Just submitted an article with submission code RR4559. I don't understand it. How many articles does this magazine publish in a year?

(0) Thank | Susie Jenny

The review process started on December 1st, and there is still no news. Even though it's Christmas and a two-week holiday, there should have been some communication by now. Does anyone know what's going on? Feeling anxious

(0) Thank | 烈焰晓博

About 4 months

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

How long does it usually take for this magazine to receive proof?

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Rejected very quickly, rejected in 4 days

(0) Thank | Amanda Longman

Review speed: 2.0 Experience sharing: I also recently submitted an article for major revision, but I did not see a deadline. Has anyone who has submitted before give me some advice?

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 50.0
Experience Sharing: Today I checked the submission system and found that my article has been accepted. I calculated that it took me a total of 2 months and 2 days from submission to review to revisions to acceptance. I really admire the efficiency of Americans

(0) Thank | Dorothy Needham

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 50.0
Experience Sharing: When I opened the submission system today, I found that the editor-in-chief of the journal asked me to make some minor revisions to the article (such as tense, etc.) and it would be accepted. I feel very excited, this should be my second SCI during my master's degree. I will now publish the review time for everyone to refer to:
Potential Associate Editor Assigned 2014-07-21
Potential Associate Editor Accept 2014-07-21
Associate Editor Assigned 2014-07-21
Associate Editor Decision Started 2014-07-29
Associate Editor Decision Completed 2014-07-29
On August 1st, the editor suggested to make some minor revisions. Let's quickly make the changes. Keep it up!

(0) Thank | Dorothy Needham

Submitted on July 1st, currently still Associate Editor Assigned, it has been two weeks, does this mean that the deputy editor has assigned reviewers and is in the process of reviewing? The status of this journal is different from regular journals, so feeling a bit puzzled??

(0) Thank | 桃花来普