What is the submission website address?

(0) Thank | renzifushuai

The official website of the journal and the submission webpage have incorrect URLs and cannot be accessed.

(0) Thank | merlin

Do you think this is funny?

(0) Thank | 水桥安晏

When responding to the comments from the reviewers, all questions must be answered one by one without omission; try to meet the experimental requirements mentioned in the comments, and provide reasonable explanations if unable to meet them; the literature recommended by the reviewers must be cited and thoroughly discussed; when submitting the revised manuscript, make sure to check the corrections made in the original manuscript.

If you agree with the modifications suggested by the editor when responding to the comments from the journal editor, you can simply accept the changes. If you disagree, provide your reasons directly below the comments, and then provide feedback to the editor. If there is a disagreement, negotiate further

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

If possible, try to supplement the experiment. If not, consider seriously defending the reasons, but a humble and cautious tone is essential. After all, there is a certain rejection rate for major revisions

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The reviewers asked me to conduct additional experiments, but my samples are already used up/the experiment has already concluded. Will it result in rejection if I directly mention that my samples are used up?

(0) Thank | 上清雨真

What are the differences between responding to reviewers' comments and responding to editorial comments?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys