Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1368-9800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1475-2727 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 4.00% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.nutritionsociety.org/publications/nutrition-society-journals/public-health-nutrition | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/phnutr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, EDINBURGH BLDG, SHAFTESBURY RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CB2 8RU | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Medicine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Bimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 237 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1368-9800%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: Ordinary, 3-6 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: Easy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
First Previous 1 2 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION: | Write a review |
Author: 熊二惨兮兮 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-10-19 16:04:07 First review took 3 months. It was so slow that you might doubt your life. Usually it is a blind review by multiple experts, and the suggestions made are very sharp. All the data should be re-analyzed. If some analysis can be performed in both methods A and B, if you use method A, the expert will let you re-analyze using method B. They embarrassed the authors to the extreme. Another article of my friend took 8 months from submission to acceptance. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 水月统勋 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-11-17 17:20:09 How are you doing now? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 碧桃素怀 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-10-28 15:12:18 Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Weighted research direction: environmental epidemiology Experience sharing: Submitted on June 12th, still under review, the reminder was ignored. How come the review process is taking so long for this journal? Just wondering if anyone has been rejected three months later, it's really torturing ![]() ![]() |
Author: 水月统勋 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-10-27 23:57:42 It has been over a month, still under review ![]() ![]() |
Author: 水月统勋 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-10-10 18:24:47 Wow, it's been twenty days already, and it's still under review. I guess it hasn't been sent for external review yet ![]() ![]() |
Author: 水月统勋 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-23 22:02:43 How's the speed of this magazine? It's been 5 days and it's still "Awaiting Editorial Assistant Processing" ![]() ![]() |
Author: Alexia Joseph Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-04-12 15:45:17 How much is the layout fee? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Max Charlotte Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-08-22 23:49:26 Does the first review take so long? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 努力啊大昌黎 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-08-16 12:53:58 Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: The first review took 8 months, with dozens of questions from two reviewers. The second review was accepted in 50 days. It took almost 10 months in total. Reviewers of similar types will always ask for additional analysis ![]() ![]() |
Author: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-30 14:19:50 Abstracts include some common key parts, each part is about one or two sentences, such as background, aim or purpose of research, method used, findings/results, and conclusion ![]() ![]() |
Author: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-30 09:17:27 Each sentence in the abstract should provide as much information as possible, while being concise. The length of the abstract generally should not exceed 300 words. The beginning of the abstract should present the most important information (but without repeating the title). It can be the purpose or topic, as well as the results or conclusions. The abstract should include no more than 4 or 5 of the most important points, results, or implications ![]() ![]() |
Author: Darlene Pepys Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-26 21:02:19 How can I make reviewers understand my research by reading the abstract alone? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 修然小公主 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-26 09:50:26 How to write an abstract? Is there a template? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 藤原乐语 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-08-12 08:11:21 The first review took 3 months, and the second review required 3 revisions. It took almost 7 months from submission to acceptance. The review experts were very strict and raised many sharp questions that needed patience and careful consideration to answer. It really tested the author's ability to withstand pressure, but it helped the author to have a deeper reflection on their research ![]() ![]() |
Author: 北海冰凡 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-07-28 17:51:11 Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: It was rejected after 3 months of external review, the reviewers were very strict and raised sharp questions, many of which were difficult to address (sample size, study design, etc.). It's frustrating. Submitting a manuscript requires a strong heart ![]() ![]() |
Author: 是你的庚申呀 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-06-30 14:13:48 Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Sharing experience: Starting from 2021, they started charging publication fees, which they did not do before. The review process was relatively fast, with a response from the first review within a month and acceptance after two weeks of revisions. The difficulty level was considered relatively easy. The three reviewers provided nearly 20 modification suggestions in total, which were quite objective ![]() ![]() |
Author: 断门淑宁 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-10-19 17:25:38 Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: The first review took 3 months, slow enough to make one question life. Typically, it is reviewed by multiple experts in a blind review format, and the suggestions are sharp. All data needs to be reanalyzed. If there are alternative analysis methods like method a and method b, and you chose method a, the experts will ask you to reanalyze using method b. They push authors to the limit. Another friend took 8 months from submission to acceptance ![]() ![]() |
Author: 羽沫可爱吗 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-10-19 11:15:15 The first review takes three months. The blind review process is really strict, with experts and editors offering many sharp and difficult-to-handle opinions. Submitting to this journal requires a strong ability to withstand criticism and patience. The chances of getting accepted are probably only around 20% ![]() ![]() |
Author: 宫古慧慧 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-10-31 11:23:48 Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Sharing of experience: Do you charge a layout fee for the magazine? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-07-18 17:06:55 Although there haven't been any major changes this year, let's wait and see in the future ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-09-01 11:18:14 received an invitation to review the journal, very strict, blind trial. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 江南芃芃 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-09-01 08:06:23 Review Speed: 6.0 | Acceptance Rate: 25.0 Experience Sharing: Receiving an invitation to review for this journal is very strict, it is a double-blind review process ![]() ![]() |
Author: 蒙德乐山 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-07-22 23:32:30 Waiting anxiously for a month and a half, undergoing three evaluations, two suggesting major repairs, one pointing out too many issues, ultimately ending in tragedy. Sigh ![]() ![]() |
Author: 蒙德乐山 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-06-06 21:38:46 Is the layout fee of this magazine expensive? Can it be discounted? Is the review period long? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 北风振杰 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-03-19 18:12:19 Rejected after review in February ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 Next Last (To Page |