Submission to reception lasted 17 months, of which 3 reviewers added nearly 60 comments, nearly 4,000 words. After the overhaul, the minor repairs went smoothly, just changing a few words. But it took nearly a year from minor repairs to reception. After receiving the editor, the editor issued an apology letter saying that the article required a lot of language editing work. The journal is a good journal, and the editors and reviewers are very responsible. Finally, they accepted it.

(0) Thank | 橘林

Excuse me, is this magazine charged? Thank you

(0) Thank | 半月晚竹

The total number of articles in 2017 was 130, with 102 articles being original research. Submitted on November 21, 2016, revised on January 30, 2017, revised again on May 29, 2017, and finally accepted on April 10, 2018, the manuscript went through a total of 17 months before being accepted. The major revision included feedback from three reviewers totaling nearly 60 comments and around 4000 words. The minor revision after the major one went smoothly, mostly focusing on grammar corrections. However, the period from the minor revision to acceptance took nearly a year. After acceptance, the editor-in-chief sent an apology letter, mentioning a need for extensive language editing. The journal is reputable, with responsible editors and reviewers. Despite the challenges, the article was eventually accepted, marking the author's first publication in a prestigious scientific journal

(0) Thank | Augus Paul

Feels like a very good journal, considering giving it a try. Great for those who are about to graduate and have special requirements for the Impact Factor. As for the difficulty level, it is unknown

(0) Thank | 孤云璠瑜

The editor is very responsible and meticulous, and it is a very good magazine

(0) Thank | 奉天书萱

The editor is very responsible and is a very good journal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous