Highlight the innovation of your research, showing distinctive characteristics different from others. The difference in size is another issue, but the important thing is to have a difference. As long as there is a difference, it is innovation

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Given the diversity and complexity of biology, it is perfectly acceptable for different results to emerge and be published, as scientific research itself allows and encourages questioning, supplementation, and improvement of previous knowledge, and even overturning it. When writing papers, we need to focus on two main strategies: accurately describe the materials and methods and results, especially highlighting any discrepancies with others, and be detailed; in the discussion section, we should not avoid contradictions, compare similarities and differences with previous studies, and try to provide reasonable and effective explanations

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to highlight the innovation of an article in the discussion?

(0) Thank | 北国博达

How to handle it when the results of my discussion are different from the previous articles I wrote?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

Is it easy to accept meta-analysis on genetic polymorphisms?

(0) Thank | 珉林佳宜

Review speed: 3.0 Sharing experience: 20190327 submitted 20190409 under review 20190624 major revision after first review 20190708 minor revision 20190729 proofreading 20190820 proofreading ready for publication

(0) Thank | 太极若蕊

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission success rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: It is still relatively acceptable. It took a long time to submit an article, but it finally got submitted

(0) Thank | 会云姑娘

Which hero has ever submitted an article to this magazine? I've been waiting for ten days and still haven't received a submission number

(0) Thank | Spencer Esther