The speed is still relatively fast, and the quality of the paper is relatively high. The first review required a rejection and resubmission, and we responded the comments with more than a dozen pages. A major revision was required later, then a minor revision, and then it was accepted. First submitted at the beginning of April, accepted at the end of August.

(0) Thank | wangxq873

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Research focus: Cell biology; Biology

Experience sharing: Submission was rejected twice. The first time due to formatting issues, and while also requesting the original WB strip to be uploaded. The second time was due to grayscale scanning issues with the strip. After communicating with the editor-in-chief, revisions were made according to their suggestions, and the paper was successfully resubmitted on the third attempt. After two months of review, revisions were requested for two issues. After making revisions, the editor was unsatisfied with one of the answers to the issues, prompting another round of revisions. After the third round of revisions, the paper was finally accepted. The submission was made on February 28th, accepted on June 9th, and went online on June 20th. The editor was extremely meticulous and friendly, with a very fast processing speed. However, it was disappointing to see the rating drop below 3.0 right after acceptance

(0) Thank | 行云庆娇

The submission was rejected twice. The first time was due to formatting issues and a requirement to upload the WB original strip. The second time was because of grayscale scanning problems. After communicating with the editor-in-chief and following their advice, the submission was successful on the third attempt. Two months after submission, the manuscript was returned with two minor revisions. After making the revisions, the editor-in-chief was unsatisfied with one of the answers given and requested further revisions. After the third round of revisions, the manuscript was accepted. The submission was made on February 28th, and it was accepted on June 9th. The online publication date was June 20th. The editor-in-chief was very meticulous and friendly, and the processing speed was fast. However, it is regrettable that the rating dropped below 3 immediately after acceptance.

(7) Thank | echowxt12205588

Hello! What is the main focus of your article?

(0) Thank | 行云青亦

Maybe

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Keywords should be avoided in the title. This advice is given by most journals

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Can keywords be extracted from the title?

(0) Thank | 深渊兴业

Will the reviewers be able to identify the novelty of my research through the keywords I provide?

(0) Thank | 深渊兴业

The impact factor is not very high, and it is only in the third quartile. However, the reviewers and editors are very rigorous, and they raise professional questions without intentionally making things difficult. To be honest, the article has shown significant improvement after revision. The process is also very fast, so graduating students can give it a try.

(1) Thank | 小小孩

Review Speed: 2.0 Experience Sharing: The review speed is relatively fast, with high requirements for the quality of the paper. After the first review, the decision was to reject and resubmit. The response included over ten pages of comments. After major revisions, followed by minor revisions, the paper was finally accepted. The paper was submitted in early April and accepted at the end of August

(0) Thank | 五轮博达

We can only hope for the best next year, after all, as long as the overall trend is going up, there is no need to worry. Even if it only increases by a little bit each year, accumulatively, it is still good

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The processing speed of the article is relatively fast, and it is the smoothest one among the articles I have submitted. It took less than three months from submission to acceptance

(0) Thank | 狮吼迎荷

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Sharing experience: The first submission was returned due to some issues, then communicated with the editor-in-chief, who had a very good attitude. The preliminary review comments came out after 1 month of revision, with minor revisions and no need for further changes at the moment. The second article has been submitted, and hopefully it will be accepted before graduation. Wishing the journal continued success and looking forward to detailed analysis of positive news

(0) Thank | 千花悦心

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission success rate: 50.0 
Experience sharing: During the graduate stage, my first article was in English. I initially submitted to Plant Science, but was rejected for lack of novelty. I then submitted to PROTO journal in early May, and in early July the editor replied that major revisions were needed. Only one reviewer raised some issues, some of which were ridiculous. After resubmitting two weeks later, in late July I received a second response from the editor saying the reviewer had rejected the article, but the editor was willing to give me another chance to revise. Finally, around August 20, I saw the acceptance notice, and the article was online in early September. Overall, it was relatively quick, especially from acceptance to online, and I am very thankful for the editor's support. Although the journal is not highly renowned, it is suitable for novice article writers to try their hand

(0) Thank | 大力利娇

This journal is now rated 2.5, which is a significant improvement from last year. Is there a chance to take it up to 3?

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

We have crossed the 2-point mark, and next year we might have a slight breakthrough. There is great hope

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁