.

(6) Thank | Anonymous

4.23 Submission
4.24 Waiting for Editor Assignment
4.25 Under Review
5.28 Awaiting Decision
5.29 Reject
After a month, there has been no review feedback at all.
Reason for rejection: Unable to find reviewers (it is said that 17 invitations were all declined)
So everyone, ADM: B Team, The Proceedings PROD: Not assigned Under Review status does not necessarily mean it has been sent for review! Do not assume Under Review means it has been sent for review, as it is possible that reviewers have not been found! Also, this journal requires original data to be uploaded when submitting a manuscript.

(0) Thank | 山目於

Is it normal that the submission made on the 3rd of April is still Awaiting BM Recommendation?

(0) Thank | xclmoth

The average review period of this magazine is quite long. They have their own statistics that show the average time for the first external review is 57 days. With the addition of recommendations from associate editors and decisions from the editor-in-chief, the first round of results can take longer, around 90 days. If a second round of external review is needed, the time is slightly shorter, around a month. The associate editors are all very skilled, many of them are researchers from prestigious universities. In addition to external review comments, associate editors also provide additional suggestions. Sometimes, the suggestions from associate editors are even more professional than those from external experts. Engaging with peers, even if one's ideas are rejected, is a very enjoyable way to make progress and improve oneself.

(0) Thank | Actually Man

6.28 status changed to awaiting decision.

(0) Thank | 金元宝666

The review comments are very professional.

(0) Thank | 小民chen

Submitted on 4/20, it has been under review for 45 days with no updates yet. Is this normal?

(0) Thank | 金元宝666

It should have been sent for external review, with a status of "awaiting BM recommendation" (meaning it has been assigned to an editor for initial review, and if not rejected, it is under review

(0) Thank | ID518

ADM: B Team, The Proceedings
PROD: Not Assigned
Under Review

Is this an external review that has been in this state for half a month?

(0) Thank | 小民chen

Submitted in early January 2024
Rejected at the end of February 2024, suggested resubmission after revisions
Resubmitted in mid-March 2024
Accepted in mid-April 2024

(0) Thank | ID518

It should be accepted directly because the name ADM should be an editor when in the review status

(0) Thank | subutei

Feedback on revisions will be provided 3 months after submission, and acceptance of revisions will occur within 2 weeks of resubmission

(0) Thank | subutei

I am in this state now, so is under review sent for external review? (In other journals, under review is actually editor review, not sent for external review

(0) Thank | Sweetie hhrew

The review comments have not come back yet, but I received an email this week saying that there is a delay because the reviewers have not submitted their comments. It seems like an automatic reminder system, as it has been just over a month since the initial submission

(0) Thank | CCL_bio

Is this status under review? Is there a result?

(0) Thank | 气候变化

Submitted in early January 2023
Rejected and resubmitted in mid-March 2023 (two reviewers)
Revision in mid-June 2023
Rejected in mid-August 2023 (third reviewer)
After appeal, rejected and resubmitted at the end of August 2023
Revision in early October 2023
Minor revision in mid-November 2023 (fourth reviewer)
Revision in late November 2023
Accepted in mid-January 2024

It took a whole year, but it was finally accepted. Each round of peer review took about 50-60 days. To be honest, although the impact factor is not high, the reputation of Royal B is still very good

(2) Thank | 低碳苼活

Last week submitted, the first day I saw the status was awaiting BM recommendation.
Then it changed to
ADM: B Team, The Proceedings
PROD: Not Assigned
Under Review
I don't know if this has been submitted for review or is still in the initial editing stage

(2) Thank | CE

How long will it take for the review to come back?

(0) Thank | 轻舞飞扬月朗风清

How much longer?

(0) Thank | 轻舞飞扬月朗风清

How are you now?

(0) Thank | 轻舞飞扬月朗风清

It has been submitted for review

(0) Thank | dgj123

The requirement for innovation is particularly high, and the top journal of animal studies has been rejected twice. One was rejected in 3 days, and one was rejected in 2 weeks, both without review, all due to lack of innovation. I hope to submit for review next time

(0) Thank | 南柯微微

It's already been submitted, so let's wait for the results

(0) Thank | 嘟嘟

PROD:Not Assigned
Under Review
Is this under review or not?

(0) Thank | dgj123

It is claimed to be the British equivalent of PNAS, with particularly high requirements for article innovation.

(0) Thank | hello 你好