The journal requires a certain degree of innovation. I feel that as long as the data is enough to tell a complete story and it has a enough novelty, there is hope to be accepted and the impact factor has always been the same. 2019.11.18 Submission. 2019.11.20 Sent for review. 2019.12.23 The review comments were returned from only two experts, which were very pertinent. The editor required a minor revision after comprehensive consideration and asked us to return the revised manuscript within one month. One of the experts mentioned that some experiment needed to be supplemented and improved, but the conditions were not enough for us to supplement the experiments, otherwise all the data would need to be re-analyzed. Therefore, I quoted classic literatures in the response letter to repeatedly explain the reliability of the experimental data and list the similarities between other documents and this research. And I have been very worried after submitting. 2020.01.13 Revised version was submitted, then it became "under review" again in the system, and I was so frightened. 2020.01.23 The editor wrote to inform us that the experts were satisfied with the revised manuscript, and it was accepted. 2020.01.27 The assistant editor wrote to inform that the publication fee of 700 dollars would be paid. 2020.02.13 A letter was received for proofreading and signing the copyright agreement. The editor was very responsible and helped improving the English usage.

(2) Thank | 翅膀的痕迹

The impact factor doesn’t change much, and I don’t know when it will over 1. The requirement for innovation is not demanding.

(1) Thank | 不爱吃鱼的猫

The speed is very fast, with two and a half months in total. It was accepted after the second review. However, we lost it on the betting of the rising of impact factor. It is still the same!

(0) Thank | 不爱吃鱼的猫

I am preparing a submission for publication. May I please ask which specific EndNote format should I use for the reference style recommended by this journal, which is CSE-style? I have tried a few times but the format does not match that of the published papers. Thank you

(0) Thank | tangtuoxian

Choose a post-hoc test method based on the data results obtained

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Comparing afterwards is testing hypotheses that were not part of the original research. It is very common in actual research: I have completed the experiment, confirmed the hypothesis, but still need to extend the research, so I continue to explore the data to see which direction might lead to valuable conclusions. At this point, it is like I am testing all possible comparisons (even though I cannot actually test all comparisons, but because I have no specific purpose, all comparisons are potential possibilities). Because comparisons do not only refer to differences in means of two treatments, linear combinations of multiple treatments are also comparisons

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Why should we conduct post-inspections?

(0) Thank | 平原文波

What kind of post-test method should I use?

(0) Thank | 北国博达

First submission, didn't understand anything, recently my article was also accepted by the Polish Journal of Microbiology. Is this journal open access only? If it requires payment, is it more convenient to use a credit card or PayPal?

(0) Thank | Lei95006

Hello, I would like to ask, I have also submitted my contribution to this magazine and reached the final step. I would like to ask, will the agreement be emailed to me by the editor or downloaded from the website? I did not receive any attachments in the proofreading email I received.

(0) Thank | 黑眼睛

Review Speed: 5.0
Experience Sharing: The review speed is relatively slow and may not be suitable for students who are eager to graduate. However, the editors and reviewers are very responsible and meticulous, and they strictly adhere to the submission requirements. The only downside is that the response time is slow, possibly due to the lower number of articles published each year

(0) Thank | 飞龙昌淼

Speed ​​is relatively slow, not suitable for students who are eager to graduate.Editors and reviewers are still very serious and responsible, and are required to strictly follow the submission requirements.The response is slower, probably because the number of articles in the year is relatively small.

(3) Thank | 1111