This is the top journal in the plasma field. It requires detailed data results together with the physical explanations. The reviewers’ opinions are very professional, which pointed some key points of the article and has greatly improved the article. I am very grateful to the reviewers and patient editors. Submitted at the end of August; Revision submitted at the beginning of October; Accepted at the end of October. The speed is quite fast, but if there are any delays, you can still urge it.

(4) Thank | 柚子

It is officially accepted, lasting three months. A very good journal, top in the field of plasma physics, with less publication volume. The article in this journal is of high quality, and it requires high novelty and physical interpretation. The comments made by the two reviewers were very professional. The editor responded quickly to the email. The submission system is very clear. The impact factor rises year by year. Submitted at the beginning of July and sent for review at the end of July (maybe because of the European summer vacation, sending for review is not very fast, it may be better to avoid summer vacation). Review comments received at the end of August, and after a moderate revision, it was accepted at the end of September.

(1) Thank | hainewstar

I submitted an article to PSST on July 1. But 7 days have passed, the status is now Awaiting Decision. Can anyone with experience in submitting an article tell me is this good news or bad news?

(3) Thank | George810

This journal attaches great importance to presentation of data, not just simple data analysis. It is a top journal in the plasma field, and the journal reviewers are very picky. Overall, the standards and levels of PSST journal are high.

(8) Thank | Hardisa

The speed of handling manuscripts is very fast, the recognition in the field is high, and the boss’s small dream publication

(0) Thank | Shan Shan

A good journal in the field of plasma sources, with high industry recognition, just hoping for a continuous increase in its impact factor.

(0) Thank | mingyue Han

The following text translates to:

"An established plasma journal, it holds high value and recognition in its niche field. The downside is that the review and evaluation process is relatively slow, and the chosen reviewers are generally strict, often delving deep into the physical mechanisms of the paper. From submission to acceptance, it went through two rounds of minor revisions, with each small revision being reviewed, hence causing a longer duration."

(3) Thank | zsdgsd

Four consecutive submissions, three rejections from water journals, and one direct tragedy. Although it appears to have undergone peer review, in reality, the editors simply reject it with a single sentence after reading it. The majority of the rejections lack any constructive feedback, usually just stating that there is no innovation. Through long-term observation, I have noticed that the majority of articles published in this European journal are by Europeans, with very few from other regions and almost none from Chinese authors. I initially thought it was a top journal in the field of plasma, but now I am very disappointed and do not recommend it.

(1) Thank | 陇右无名

Crazy tragedy, from the refusal of the editor to the rejection and transfer, trying again, hoping for a good result.

(0) Thank | 陇右无名

The journal standard is relatively high, and it is the top journal in the plasma field!

(2) Thank | XXX

journal standard is relatively high, is the plasma fieldTop journal!

(0) Thank | XXX

Plasma top level journals, high quality, low publication rate, novelty and comprehensiveness

(4) Thank | 密码

There are not many articles in the year, the review period is very long, even for half a year, editThe response is slow, and sometimes it takes more than a month to submit for review.The reviewers are generally two, and the opinions are still objective

(2) Thank | Anonymous

. I originally liked this journal very much, but I selectd for an article. The reviewer invited by the editor is simply a layman.Even the basic principles of the most basic plasma profession are not understood, and there are 5 words misspelled.I didn’t use it with the editor, and I was completely disappointed with this journal!!

(1) Thank | Anonymous