A classic journal in the botany field, with a high degree of difficulty! This is the dream journal for everyone researching in botany! It’s not easy to be accepted here, and it takes a long time to be published.

(110) Thank | 我醉眠，卿且去

First review lasted 18 days; a minor revision was required, and we spent two months supplementing the experiments. 15 days after the second review, it was accepted! Very fast!

(3) Thank | fanfan906

PP(plant physiology) is a veteran journal that once led in plant research. Later, the Plant Cell, which was launched in the late 1990s, became the leading plant journal. PP has always been comparable to the Plant Journal (P J), but slightly inferior. But PP has its own characteristics. Both PC and PJ focus on molecular biology, and PP can be said to be more inclusive.

(4) Thank | Anonymous

The classic and influential botanical journal has high impact and quality. In the field of biophysics, the first submission was reviewed within a week and the results were out within a month. After minor revisions, the paper was accepted directly. This was the smoothest experience I have had in submitting a research paper, with the whole process taking just two months. Additionally, it seems that this journal does not have major revisions, as any requests for additional experiments are usually rejected by the editors who encourage resubmission instead.

(0) Thank | Laser5200

How long does it take for Youyou to become we?

(0) Thank | lee nora

May I ask at what stage is the submission at this moment? I submitted it and have not received any confirmation from the author for the past two days.

(0) Thank | lee nora

How can we deal with being constantly in manuscript submit status?

(0) Thank | L

May I inquire about the current status of your paper?

(0) Thank | 绿禾

After submission, each author needs to confirm, and then it enters the QC process. The next day, it is under review, and a monitoring editor is assigned. The editor should review it first before deciding whether to send it out for external review.

(1) Thank | da vince

Classic journal, manuscript submitted, hoping for a positive outcome.

(1) Thank | zibozhou

It's been almost a month, still no result

(0) Thank | wawawawa

I am also replying to this, may I ask about your current situation?

(0) Thank | KaJJJJ

Excuse me, but all the suggestions given by this journal right now are about grammar and language, and I really don't understand this decision (I believe that, pending revision, this article may ultimately be acceptable for publication in Plant Physiology/Plant Physiology considers a revision for up to 60 days after a manuscript has been provisionally accepted) Is it major revision or minor revision? It's been half a month since the revision was returned. Is it still under review?

(0) Thank | wawawawa

Classic journal of botany, but the proportion of articles by Chinese people is too high. Personally, I think this is not a good phenomenon. No discipline has been almost dominated by Chinese people like botany. It's all because of the surge in articles in recent years. Whatever is easy to publish, they will do it. For disciplines that are difficult to do, Chinese people's articles will not exceed ten percent

(0) Thank | 种玉米的土豆

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title each translation "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:":1

(0) Thank | 刘先生1895

Hello, I am also in the same situation, have you found a solution?

(0) Thank | 好好的123

Is one year and two months also considered fast?

(0) Thank | xiao李

The text "30%是水刊分界线" translates to "30% is the water content boundary" in English.

(0) Thank | 林夕

According to the statistical results of 2020, Chinese researchers accounted for 28.494% of the publications in the journal Plant Physiology, ranking second. However, based on the statistical results of 2021, Chinese researchers accounted for 38.142% of the publications in the journal Plant Journal, ranking first. Additionally, in the journal New Phytologist, Chinese researchers accounted for 29.683% of the publications, ranking second. In 2022, Chinese researchers accounted for 63.27% of the total number of publications in the journal PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, which is an increase from 57.95% in 2019, placing them in the top position.

(0) Thank | 林夕

Hello, I'd like to ask if this journal doesn't differentiate between major revisions and minor revisions. My first review states that it may be accepted with major experimental and textual revisions. What does this mean?

(0) Thank | 北海洪飞

Hello! Has your submitted article been accepted?

(0) Thank | 晨2022

Awaiting Contributing Author Confirmation means "waiting for confirmation from the contributing author."

(0) Thank | 孺子牛ruziniu

Are there any specific submission format requirements for this journal?

(0) Thank | 孺子牛ruziniu

Is there a specific submission format for this journal?

(0) Thank | 孺子牛ruziniu

The upgraded version in 2022 is in Zone 1.

(0) Thank | 科研狗小白