The review was very fast, and the revision opinions were professional. Although the experimental supplementary requirements were put forward, I did not make up the experiment with reasonable explanation, instead I applied the existing research results to illustrate the problem and it was recognized by the reviewers. After submission, it was accepted within 2 months. Overall, it was very fast! I hope that the journal gets better and better and keeps the impact factor around 4.

(3) Thank | Alison

I have submitted a review, and it was accepted in more than a month. The speed was fast. The issue was that the publication fee was too high, which was about 25,000. The number of publications has increased wildly in the past two years, and the number of publications has doubled. Obviously, (there is no doubt that) the impact factor has dropped from 4 to 3. The attention is not very high, and I don’t know if it can be maintained at 3 next year.

(0) Thank | 连雨飘

The review of this journal was very strict and the review turnaround time was relatively long, but I still was optimistic about its influence.

(0) Thank | xiaobudian2018

Hey, what's the status now? Have you found the reviewers?

(0) Thank | 学不动了!

This submission took about 8.5 months, with the main time spent on inviting reviewers and re-inviting new reviewers after the original ones disappeared.

(0) Thank | lllllllll+

Update: Reviewer(s) invited on April 2, 2025
Reviewer(s) accepted on April 4, 2025
Reviewer report(s) received on April 7, 2025
Submission accepted on April 8, 2025
Submission is in publishing and rights on April 8, 2025

(0) Thank | lllllllll+

Thank you, bro.

(0) Thank | go now now

Editor-in-Chief: Daniel Dias, Deakin University-- dan.dias@deakin.edu.au

(0) Thank | lllllllll+

Bro, which email did you send the reminder to? My submission status has not been updated, the reviewer accepted the submission and then disappeared. I received a template reply from the email at the bottom of the submission page when I sent a reminder. The status has not changed yet.

(0) Thank | go now now

Update: Revision requested on March 8, 2025.
Revision received on March 20, 2025.
Submission passed technical check on March 21, 2025.

Now, the waiting editor has invited the reviewer again on March 29, 2025.

(0) Thank | lllllllll+

Submission: July 26, 2024
Technical review: July 30, 2024
With editor: July 30, 2024
Peer review, invitation to reviewers: August 6, 2024, inviting 10 reviewers at once. 
The first reviewer accepted the invitation on September 26, 2024. 
The first reviewer returned feedback on October 24, 2024. 
By mid-November, the system had not updated the second reviewer, so the editor sent a reminder letter and invited 5 new reviewers to find the second reviewer. 
The editor received responses from two reviewers and returned feedback to me on January 15, 2025. 
Two weeks were given to make revisions and return by January 29, 2025. 
Technical review passed on January 30, 2025. 
Editor returned feedback to the two reviewers on February 10, 2025. 
The previous second reviewer accepted the invitation and completed the review on February 11, 2025. 
The first reviewer dropped out, so the editor re-invited 5 reviewers on February 17, 2025. 
Two new reviewers accepted the invitation to review on February 18, 2025.

Currently waiting for the new reviewers to complete their reviews...

(0) Thank | lllllllll+

Submission received
26 Jul 2024
Revision requested
15 Jan 2025

(0) Thank | lllllllll+

This journal is pretty good. Just reviewed a paper on transfer learning of 4 types of vegetable diseases today, the quality is good.

(0) Thank | 向大牛学习

Can I ask if this speed is normal for you guys?

(0) Thank | Anchovyyyy

In early August, submitted
In late August, rejected with encouragement to resubmit
In late November, resubmitted
In early December, review completed, minor revisions suggested
In mid-December, revised
In early January, accepted
In mid-January, published

(0) Thank | Moon of sky

Two reviewers.

(0) Thank | AGCT

How many reviewers is this journal looking for, OP?

(0) Thank | successful

How many reviewers does this journal have? Thank you for your answer

(0) Thank | successful

Hello, may I ask how much the layout fee is?

(0) Thank | 哈哈哈11

How much is the layout fee?

(0) Thank | 哈哈哈11

I submitted the methodology, not the research. The reviewers invited by this editor are quite prompt in responding, and basically provide their review comments within two weeks

(0) Thank | 灰太狼家的小鸭子

Please accept our apologies for the delay to your manuscript

(0) Thank | 向大牛学习

Received: 6 December 2023
Revised: 4 January 2024
Accepted: 7 February 2024
Online: 15 February 2024
Submitted on December 6th, then went into review. Received minor revisions feedback on January 4th, with a two-week window for revisions. Requested an extension via email to one month, which the editor kindly approved

(0) Thank | 灰太狼家的小鸭子

Review comments are due in 70 days. The reviewers are extremely careless and irresponsible, with brief and vague comments that are hard to be convincing. The issues raised are all mentioned in the manuscript, leading to doubts if they have actually read it. Not recommended for submission

(2) Thank | jingkunyan

Submit the feedback after two months and twenty days, and hire after one week of revision. The whole process takes 3.5 months.

(0) Thank | AGCT