My god, how resentful of other people's opinions are you? Do you spray me after spraying downstairs? I'm just telling you that these journals have their own specificities, so you just sprayed me that publishing a paper relating to plant in Nature Micro of plants was a dream? How about I throw an article to see if you are living in a dream? Jiang C, Cao S, Wang Z, Xu H, Liang J, Liu H, Wang G, Ding M, Wang Q, Gong C, Feng C, Hao C, Xu JR (2019) An expanded subfamily of G-protein-coupled receptor genes in Fusarium graminearum required for wheat infection. Nature Microbiology. doi:10.1038/s41564-019-0468-8

(5) Thank | zkc

As an internationally renowned botany journal, PJ has always had a good reputation in the field. Although the impact factor has been maintained at 5 in recent years, many articles in it are not worse than in PP. The submission experience is very good. The editor will first send it for review and then decide whether to accept it based on the reviewers’ suggestion, instead of rejecting directly in some other journals, where there is no chance for the manuscript to reach the reviewers. My article was first reviewed for 1 month, and then it took about 40 days to revise it back, and another month to get accepted. It’s about four months in total. The main reason was that there was no supplementary experiment required. Both editors and reviewers are very accomplished people in the field. They have put forward many valuable opinions on the logic and details of the article, and the grade of the article has been improved a lot after the revision.

(6) Thank | 快乐的小疯子

This journal has been around for a while, and the impact factor has not changed much. If you like plant science, pay attention to the "Forefront of Plant Science" WeChat public number, search: frontiersin. I hope to review for this journal myself in the future.

(1) Thank | wznn

Hello, may I ask what is the maximum similarity check threshold for this journal?

(0) Thank | 周周呀

Is this journal always so slow? Submitted at noon on 1/21, it still shows "Undergoing submission checks" on 1/25. Does the review before entering "With editor" status have to take so long?

(0) Thank | 翡翠台沸腾鱼

What's going on with the constant repetition of "we" and "ur"?

(1) Thank | 勇敢牛牛一号

Hello, I wanted to ask what is the situation with we and ur status constantly changing back and forth?

(0) Thank | 勇敢牛牛一号

7.30 with editor
9.4 under review (we ur has been converted several times)
10.26 revise and resubmit
11.12 resubmit
12.17 accept

(1) Thank | 科研新手123

Under review after a month plus a few days...

(0) Thank | 科研新手123

It's been a month with the editor...

(1) Thank | 科研新手123

Secondly, in the process of submitting to PJ, the three experts may feel that the paper is relatively complete and do not have any major suggestions for additional experiments. It is all minor revisions, including supplementing data and beautifying figures. The opinions of the three experts have made a very significant contribution to improving the quality of the paper, and we are very grateful to these experts.

(1) Thank | Gawen

First of all, this article was submitted to Plant Physiology in early 23 years, and two reviewers provided many valuable suggestions. After comprehensive consideration, the editor rejected the manuscript. Later, following the experts' advice, I conducted experiments for more than half a year, improved the text, and resubmitted it to Plant Journal. I would like to thank the two experts from Plant Physiology, without their excellent suggestions, the submission process to PJ would not have been so smooth.

(0) Thank | Gawen

Submission on 4.4, minor revisions on 5.7, revised on 6.13, accepted on 6.18. A smooth submission process, grateful to all.

(0) Thank | Gawen

"Under review" means it is under review.

(0) Thank | Druid

Submitted on the third day and with editor, then Under review on the same day, does this mean it has been sent for external review?

(0) Thank | wz

Submitted on February 8th, revised on March 17th, resubmitted on April 18th, and accepted on July 1st. The review process was indeed slow, but thankfully it was ultimately accepted.

(0) Thank | Druid

I also want to know if "with editor" has always meant rejection. I haven't received any feedback either

(0) Thank | 零零吃黑鸭

May I ask how long ago you received your first external audit notification? I submitted one before the new year, and its status is still under review

(0) Thank | ly063

Any updates on my situation? It's been almost two months and it's still under review

(0) Thank | ly063

Encountering the same situation as you, how is your progress going?

(0) Thank | 尚春雨

The journal is a good journal, a well-established one

(0) Thank | 尚春雨

Three reviewers, two major revisions, one rejection, editor rejection

(0) Thank | 萝卜大丸子

May I ask about the current status and progress of the submitted contributions?

(0) Thank | 522468115

One month still with editor

(0) Thank | 萝卜大丸子

Excuse me, OP, is the review process of this journal fast? How long does it take from submission to acceptance?

(0) Thank | xiao李