The comments were given in one month and a half, major revision was required. One reviewer required major revision, and the other one required minor revision. After the revision, one of the reviewers thought it can be accepted, the other one had some minor comments and asked to make a minor revision. I have submitted it and wait for the result.

(1) Thank | Smile WU

The reviewers of this journal are very responsible and thorough. The editor's attitude is also very good and relatively accommodating. After I uploaded the revised version, there was no news after three months. I rushed and it was accepted after 12 days. In short, the whole process was good.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

A classic old journal in the field of breeding, which has always been classified as a Q3 journal, has now been moved to Q4, which is unreasonable and unfair

(1) Thank | MolBreed

2022.5.25, submission
2022.7.25, first major repair
2022.9.25, return
2022.9.25, minor repair
2022.11.14, return
2022.12.22, second major repair
2023.3.16, return
2023.6.2, acceptance
Although it is slow, the experts are very professional and meticulous, and the editorial staff is also professional. Classics are classics, and the experts' questions are constructive, thank you.

(0) Thank | 若曦

After overhauling twice, the reviewer re-examined and then received it directly. It is being published. I feel that the reviewer is very meticulous and the proposed amendment is very objective and helpful for the improvement of the thesis.The editor is also very serious.

(0) Thank | gang

recently published 1 article onlineGenome-wide association analysis reveals flowering-related genes regulating rachis length in rice" article, reviewed 4 times, directly accepted after revision (two overhauls, two minor repairs, estimated that the first two reviewers overhaul, minor repairs;2 reviewers overhaul and minor repairs; feeling editors are objective and positive, reviewers are also very careful to point out the inadequacies, we also make every effort to modify; in short, the authors and reviewers and editorsEveryone works together!Thank you all!

(0) Thank | xufengbai@mail.hzau.edu.cn

After meeting the Japanese scholar, I have overhauled it twice.However, the editor is interested, but still accepted.Now in the middle of the publication...

(1) Thank | Pomology

first trial cycle 4 months, overhaul feedback 2 months, now waiting for judgment!

(0) Thank | Pomology

PLANT BREEDING and Molecular breeding, Euphytica is the three mainstream journals in the field of plant breeding, the journal requirements are not tooHigh, but must be innovative, analysis and discussion should be deep, and closely integrated with breeding applications.The manuscript is also faster, one month for the first trial results, the revised January-February acceptance, the publication is not very fast, may be related to more manuscripts

(0) Thank | Anonymous

selectd once, because the experimental design was flawed and was immediately rejected.

(0) Thank | Anonymous