The editor of this journal was extremely irresponsible. The submission showed that the editor in chief began to evaluate the manuscript, and a week later the reviewers’ comments were given as: interesting and encourage resubmit as a letter, and they said that it would be sent to the same editor and reviewer as much as possible. So, we resubmitted it in the form of letter. One week later, the manuscript was rejected without sending for review because of less data and detail, lack of novelty.

(7) Thank | mountain

Overall, the journal reviewers are very responsible, the quality of journal and IF are also increasing year by year, and it is one of the few high-level journals in the field of plant technology.

(22) Thank | keqingbo@hotmail.com

Need, but approximately will do.

(0) Thank | fenglilili

Dear outstanding young scholars, I would like to ask for your advice on whether it is necessary to indicate the word count on the author information page when submitting to this journal, as mentioned in the author guidelines. Any guidance from those who have submitted before would be greatly appreciated!

(0) Thank | 丰年006

4.19 提交
4.19 正在审阅中
4.30 小修订
5.30 修订再提交
6.10 接受

Translation:
4.19 submit
4.19 under review
4.30 minor revision
5.30 revision resubmission
6.10 accept

(0) Thank | fenglilili

May I ask, what is your situation, friend? How long does it take for the first review to come back?

(0) Thank | lee nora

Why so fast?

(0) Thank | iiiscience

4.19 submit
4.19 under review
4.30 minor revision
I was just about to inquire about external review after the holiday, and it happened so quickly.

(0) Thank | fenglilili

I submitted an article at the beginning of the year, and it has been almost 3 months, but it is still under review.

(0) Thank | iiiscience

Submitted on 24.12 -- Minor revisions given after 1 month -- Returned for revisions after 3 weeks -- Accepted 3 weeks after the second review.

(0) Thank | rogerzz

Is it true or false, is it so easy now? Is it really this easy to invest?

(0) Thank | laofu

So sometimes investing domestically is also a last resort, the reality is like this, you can pursue your ideals, but if you don't consider reality, you will sometimes feel very uncomfortable. Solve the real problems first and then start pursuing your ideals.

(0) Thank | Insect2

This magazine is so trashy, it's just a garbage dump. They publish all sorts of crappy articles. The results are totally unreliable. All hype.

(0) Thank | fission Yeast

Chinese people's water-filled trash magazines have almost zero credibility, lacking any scientific significance. Full of empty words.

(0) Thank | fission Yeast

I would like to ask, after Xiao Xiu returns, will it take exactly one month to make a decision, or approximately how long? Because I saw in the email that it is recommended to make a decision within 30 days.

(0) Thank | ison-

On average, within a month, the next status is "Awaiting decision from Associate Editor."

(0) Thank | 墟散琰琬

Hmm, if the quality of the submission is good, I feel like time will pass by faster.

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

May I ask how long the status "EO: Editor office, under review" will last and what the next status will be?

(0) Thank | 落英子晋

Excuse me, how long will the status of "EO: Editor office, under review" last, and what is the next status?

(0) Thank | 落英子晋

Could you please tell me how long the status of "EO: Editor office, under review" will last, and what is the next status?

(0) Thank | 落英子晋

Could you tell me how long the status "EO: Editor office, under review" will last and what the next status will be?

(0) Thank | 落英子晋

May I ask how long the status of "EO: Editor office, under review" will last, and what is the next status?

(0) Thank | 落英子晋

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" and ":" as headings

(0) Thank | worldfarmer

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" and ":" as headings

(0) Thank | worldfarmer

Many articles, if I were the reviewer, would be rejected directly as they are not rigorous enough

(0) Thank | 抵制不良编辑