This is a review journal by the European Society of Phytochemistry; in 2012 the IF was 4.15 ; Generally, you can't pass the external review easily. it is best to write on novel topics.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Could you please tell me how long the process typically takes? I submitted on 5.11, was assigned an editor on 5.13, and it's still in this status.

(0) Thank | 湘琴

8.9 under review
9.20 Reviewers Assigned
9.25 Under review
10.8 Minor review
10.19 Resubmit
10.21 Reviewers assigned
10.23 Under review
10.24 Accept

(0) Thank | 绕城西路

8.8 submission; 8.14 assigning reviewers, can the original poster provide a contact method for communication?

(0) Thank | 蒋布斯

Congratulations on your article being accepted. May I ask how long it took to find reviewers and for the review process?

(0) Thank | 蒋布斯

7.11 Editor Assigned

7.11 编辑分配

(0) Thank | 绕城西路

Already submitted, but the status still shows "new submission", what's going on?

(0) Thank | 绕城西路

The article has been accepted. But it has not been published yet. I have received the email with the license to publish, but when I click on it, I can only download the document, and there is no place to upload it, right？

It has been confirmed for a month now, but it is still not online. What should I do?

(0) Thank | 新橙子

There is usually no word limit, but it should take up a certain proportion

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

There should be a focus on summarizing as much preliminary research as possible, with no limit on the number of articles

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Introduction is usually written in how many words?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

How many references are generally cited in an introduction?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The editors and reviewers are very responsible and their feedback is very helpful

(0) Thank | 天池乙丑

Editing takes up so much time (it's very interesting, writing a letter like writing a poem), I've been looking for an external review for 10 days, finally got a response today, will add more good news later

(0) Thank | 宗室曼冬

Just noticed it's under review, not that the reviewer couldn't be found. Hopefully will receive the review feedback in 10 days

(0) Thank | 宗室曼冬

journal is still very good, strict language requirements, 2016 impact factor 3.393, about 50 published a yearSummary, but the review period is longer. If the article is more urgent, it is not recommended to select

(0) Thank | 哈鲁哈呀

Do Phytochemistry Reviews require any review fees or page charges for manuscript submission? Thank you! I am waiting online

(0) Thank | 水月乐水

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: I got one accepted, but it was for a special issue of a conference. Submitted on November 30th, received the first review result in less than a month, one reviewer had no comments at all, while the other reviewer seemed to not like our content very much, and only made some general comments. After some time, made some modifications based on the second reviewer's feedback, added some content, submitted on January 4th, and was accepted on the 5th. Due to not receiving the typesetting email in the meantime, it was delayed, and was only published online on February 9th. Our article is still relatively new, there are very few articles on nanotechnology in Phytochemistry Reviews, and the guest editor was very supportive. But to be honest, if it was for a regular issue instead of a special issue, I wonder if it would have been as smooth

(0) Thank | 长安湛芳

Magazine is very good, just do not know the receipt fee?

(0) Thank | 好人一生平安

The magazine is great, but I wonder if they charge for submissions?

(0) Thank | 五郎梓奥

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Mostly commissioned articles, with some submissions. It's not easy to pass the initial screening by the editors

(0) Thank | 九阴爱豪

This is my first SCI article, online2015.7 A review of a class of natural products, editedThree days after receiving the manuscript, the reviewer was arranged, that is, after the editor was over, there were two reviewers. The review time was 3 months, the reply was very punctual, and the journal received the message after the repair..Personal impressions on this journal are quite good

(0) Thank | panjuan1002@hotmail.com

Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: This is my first sci article submitted, online in July 2015. It is a review article on a type of natural product. The editor arranged reviewers three days after receiving the manuscript, which means passing the first hurdle of the editor. In the end, there were two reviewers, and the review process took three months. The responses were very timely, and the journal accepted the revision after it was submitted. Overall, I have a good impression of this journal

(0) Thank | 断门淑宁

Just published an article

(0) Thank | 龙象紫琼

With such a drop in points, what will we do next year? Last year we had 4 points, and this year we have dropped to below 3

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁