This is the mainstream journal of behavioral science, mainly related to the research on the mechanism of controlling behavioral regulation.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

8.23 with editor

(0) Thank | lzjtucwx

8.22 submitted to journal

Not sure if the BCI direction aligns with the journal's theme, documenting a risky submission.

(0) Thank | lzjtucwx

Did you receive the proof link two days after accepting it?

(0) Thank | 青椒的鸡鸡

May I ask, when replying to the comments of the manuscript review, in addition to making changes in the article, is it necessary to directly address the opinions of the reviewing experts point by point?

(0) Thank | zyp210

After more than two months of submission without any progress, I sent an email inquiry and received a rejection stating that it "does not fit within the journal's scope for publication." I feel very frustrated.

(0) Thank | Adiao

It has been almost two months and it has not been submitted for review yet. Can I urge them? Is this a tragedy in the making?

(0) Thank | Adiao

Submitted on February 7th, the status is still "with editor" to this day.

(0) Thank | Adiao

Second submission of PhB, a review article.
Two days after submission, external review was conducted, and 44 days later, the review was returned with two minor revisions.
One day after the revisions were made, the article stayed in the "with editor" status for a month before being sent for review again.
20 days later, the review was returned, and the same day, the editor accepted the revisions.
The editor highly respects the opinions of the reviewers and the journal is very friendly.

(13) Thank | Huiskie

Posted in early October, returned for revision after one month, and returned after 40 days of supplementary experiments. The second review took about one month. The second review included a minor revision and formatting changes in six places. It was returned after four days. Four days after being sent to the editor, it was directly accepted. Two days after acceptance, the proofreading draft was received, and it took two days to check. After submission, it went online the next day. In short, personally, I think it's not bad. The reviewers invited were also kind, and the editing efficiency was high. The whole process took about four months, I don't know if it was because of Christmas. Recommended!

(0) Thank | 二两.

Share the submission process for everyone's reference:
2020/11/03 Submitted to journal
2020/11/04 With Editor
2020/11/09 Under Review
2020/11/21 Under Review
2020/12/04 Under Review
2021/01/08 Sent email to urge review
2021/01/12 Received reply, reviewer unavailability
2021/01/18 Under Review
2021/02/03 Under Review
2021/02/21 Major Revision
2021/03/05 Revised
2021/03/05 With Editor
2021/03/10 Accepted

(25) Thank | Cyanide灰

Waiting for the review process requires patience.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Unpopular journal, but very friendly

(0) Thank | Anonymous