Submitted in late February, the first review took three months. After two major revisions by two reviewers, it was accepted in less than a month. The whole process took four months.

(0) Thank | zz

The review process was very slow, with two reviewers providing feedback - one major revision, one minor revision. It took 3-4 months for each round of revisions to receive a decision after submission. The paper was submitted on November 7, 2023, and accepted on February 24, 2025, taking a total of 1 year and 4 months.

(0) Thank | zhoujing2188

The main journal of pediatric pulmonology, with enough prestige, used to have a score of around 3 points, and I have also had a few articles accepted in the past. This time, however, my submission of a single-center retrospective cohort was rejected, which made me feel a bit more proud than before. This journal itself is very strict; there was once a manuscript that had to be revised six times before being accepted. It's a great journal that doesn't charge any fees!

(2) Thank | petshi530

Isn't this America?

(0) Thank | 黑沙红波

It is generally believed that the title and keywords complement each other around the research topic

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Keyword selection should cover key industries of the manuscript as much as possible. For example, choose 4 keywords, where the first 2 keywords can define the scientific research industry or the other half of scientific research, and the remaining 2 keywords can select research methods, research methods, making it easy for readers to find the author's manuscript from each perspective

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to choose the first two keywords?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

Relationship between keywords and titles?

(0) Thank | 魂魄彦露

More than a month later, I received feedback again. The editor was very responsible, and I quite liked their attitude. Maybe my article was controversial, so after the revisions were rejected, I had nothing to say

(0) Thank | 龙鳞自立

How fast is the reviewing process for the magazine?

(0) Thank | 璃沙宝花

Review speed: 6.0 Research focus: Pediatrics Basic Experience Sharing: After I submitted, I received major revisions feedback within a month, revised for two months, and now it has been more than a month, feeling too slow

(0) Thank | 龙鳞自立

Can I have a receipt, please?

(0) Thank | Jared Meredith

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: I have published 2 articles and 1 meta-analysis on it in recent years. It ranked 3 points in 2017 Impact Factor (IF) but the real-time IF in 2018 was not ideal, and it may fall below 3 points again. Pediatric journals are not favored by IF, but I personally think it is a very good journal

(0) Thank | 平原薇歌

Review Speed: 3.0
Experience Sharing: Recently submitted a paper, accepted by the reviewer, but rejected by the main editor, with very unreasonable feedback

(0) Thank | 东海高兴

Research focus: Pediatrics

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Magazine Name: Pediatric Pulmonology
Field of Specialty: Pediatrics
Country of Magazine: UK
Year of Submission: March 2009
Review Period: Approximately 20 days
Major and Minor Revisions: One major revision, one minor revision
Time from Submission to Acceptance (Rejection): 2 months
Language Polishing Required: No
Page Charges: No
Personal Review (Feelings or Experience): The review process is relatively fast, and it seems that the editorial requirements are not very high. However, it takes about 4 months from acceptance to ONLINE (the previous paper, also in this journal

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁