You can recommend citing the corresponding authors in the references, as they usually have a good understanding of your field, and you have cited their articles

(0) Thank | 韦陀听枫

Ask your supervisor or other relevant personnel to make a recommendation

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

With the increasing specialization of disciplines, it is difficult for journals to find appropriate peer review experts. Therefore, requesting authors to recommend reviewers is a mutually beneficial practice: journals can find suitable reviewers and save time searching for them, while authors can provide support through their own networks and recommend scholars who can best understand the submitted papers

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is a recommended reviewer/expert/peer?

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

I don't know any experts, can you still recommend?

(0) Thank | 深渊兴业

The same question, is it more biased towards clinical or basic research?

(0) Thank | Caesar Hart

Why can't I generate the PDF or submit it?
whzcj 2020-04-07 13:42:00 Posted: Submitted a new article on COVID-19, waiting for review for 3 days

(0) Thank | 是你的爱玲呀

How many first authors are allowed?

(0) Thank | Frank Max

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0 Experience sharing: Submitted an article on COVID-19, accepted in 3 days

(0) Thank | 碧桃溪蓝

Is there a submission website available?

(0) Thank | 水月迎蕾

Excuse me, could you provide the submission website for this magazine?

(0) Thank | 金山琳晨

Rejected after major revisions - how bad was the writing

(0) Thank | 燃木良策

Under Review means it has been sent out for external review. It took about 3 months for the review. The first review took around two and a half months. Although the reviewers raised many questions, they were all solvable. It was a minor revision. After the minor revision, it was accepted after another month. The requirements didn't seem too high

(0) Thank | 燃木良策

Could you please tell me if it leans more towards clinical or basic? Thank you

(0) Thank | 八荒文茵

There haven't been any big changes this year, but we'll see what happens in the future

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Recently submitted an article, it's still under review in January, hoping it will be accepted

(0) Thank | 残月文翰

Hello, I would like to ask if co-authors must reply to emails

(0) Thank | 碧波鸿文

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: It is a bit exaggerated to say that the submission acceptance rate is 25%, it should be around 50%, and the article requirements are not high. In addition, although this journal is classified as a first-tier journal in pediatrics, it should be considered a second-tier journal in infectious diseases. The review speed is average, with the first review taking about three months and acceptance within six months, but the time to publication is slow. It took about a year for my article to be published. Overall, the submission process is relatively easy, with not many innovative requirements. Articles supported by sufficient experimental data can give it a try

(0) Thank | 春桃三岁啦

Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: Basically, once the submission was made, it went under review. The first review took about two and a half months, during which the reviewers raised many questions that were all able to be resolved. It was minor revisions, and after the revisions, it was accepted after another month. The requirements didn't seem too high

(0) Thank | 璃沙依珂

I'm dizzy... Just got a good score on a test and then it was lowered

(0) Thank | 泄矢韦曲

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: The magazine itself claims a hit rate of only 25%

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Research focus: Pediatrics

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Research focus: Pediatrics

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁