The manuscript was submitted in December, and the result of the first review came out in a month. There were 3 reviewers who were pretty responsible, and they were experts in the field. They raised many minor questions. I basically revised the manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. After the second review, the reviewers were basically satisfied, and the status (of the article) is still minor revision for now. The editor was responsible, and the reviewers were experts, whose comments were pertinent, which were helpful to improve the quality of the article.

(10) Thank | 1946407803

PARASITE VECTOR The journal is great! The editorial office and reviewers are extremely serious and responsible. The review time is not very long. The first review took about a month. Many very detailed and professional questions were asked. It can be seen that the reviewers are domain experts and have spent a lot of energy on the review. The second review lasted for half a month, and they asked some more questions, but it didn’t embarrass us. The third review lasted for a week without any comments. They thought that we cooperated well and answered well, and directly agreed to accept it. The review quality is high and the opinions are pertinent, which is very helpful to improve the quality of the article. I plan to consider submit another manuscript to the journal later.

(11) Thank | Shiping

The editing process is relatively fast, and the comments provided are also very pertinent. After meeting the reviewers' comments, the article was accepted. You’d better to pay attention to the issues such as spelling and formatting.

(4) Thank | 阿波罗

It is not clear why the editor takes so long, this journal is really not as fast as online.

(0) Thank | 爱吃水果糖

2024.2.9 Submitted
2024.2.10 Under review
2024.3.13 Minor revision
2024.3.22 Revision submitted
2024.3.23 Accepted
A very efficient journal, from submission, review to decision, everything is done promptly and decisively without any delay. The only downside is that the publication fee is a bit expensive

(0) Thank | Cavatina

Submission on 18th December 2023

(0) Thank | xiaoyuchenny

has selectd once, but it has been edited because it has not been sent to the external audit, because the editor himself refused because the method of our experiment was not good.Is it overbearing, just because the opinions are different?!

(3) Thank | Anonymous

2012 published an article in the journal.Qi Kui first trial 5 working days second trial 1 work editor will check the mailbox on the weekend

(1) Thank | Anonymous