The review cycle was long, and the reviewers were more careful. I urged twice in the middle and it was rejected in 5 months. It was rejected, but they gave quite detailed comments.

(0) Thank | moonala

Research subjects/experimental conditions/some kind of experimental treatment/experimental conclusions and other elements

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Title: Guidelines for Controlling Title Length in SCI Papers

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What should be paid attention to in the title of an article?

(0) Thank | Oswald Edie

Please translate the following passage into English and Japanese, and title the translations with ":" and ":". What points should the article title include?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

No page charges. I have not chosen open access

(0) Thank | Ula Clara

The review process took a long time, the reviewers were very thorough, and I had to follow up twice in the middle. After 5 months, my paper was rejected. Despite the rejection, the reviewers provided detailed feedback

(0) Thank | 长安诗岚

What should I do after receiving it? I didn't receive any email about paying the page charges

(0) Thank | 一条小芷雪

When can I expect to receive the page fee notification after acceptance?

(0) Thank | 一条小芷雪

We can only hope for next year, after all, no need to worry as the overall trend is upward. Even if it rises only a little in a year, it will accumulate over time

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Just submitted a paper, the review speed was 3 months, accepted after major revision once and minor revision once

(0) Thank | Ula Clara

Just submitted an article, it took 3 months for the review process, and after one major revision and one minor revision, it got accepted

(0) Thank | Ula Clara

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: Just submitted a paper, the review speed is very slow, minor revisions were accepted after 2 times, but had to wait a long time each time. If you are in a hurry, it's better not to submit to this journal. The paper submitted in July 2014 was not officially published online until July 2015, a whole year

(0) Thank | 雁荷酱

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: Published a study on ERP processing in chronic pain. The first review took 3 months, with 2 major revisions and 1 minor revision. Recently submitted another paper, which took almost 4 months for the first review. After making revisions as suggested, it was resubmitted. The ease of publication is considered average. The expert reviews were very detailed

(0) Thank | 乙酉大叔

It has been over three months and it is still under review; the review process is too slow

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Is it really suitable for Chinese people to invest? Experienced seniors, please share your insights

(0) Thank | 长拳湘君

The review process is too slow

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁