| Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Title | ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Journal Title Abbreviations | ANN MO BOT GARD | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 0026-6493 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 6.80% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Official Website | http://www.bioone.org/loi/mobt | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Online Manuscript Submission | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Publisher | MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN, 2345 TOWER GROVE AVENUE, ST LOUIS, USA, MO, 63110 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject Area | Biology | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Publication Frequency | Quarterly | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Year Publication Started | 1914 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Annual Article Volume | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0026-6493%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| *All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
| Reviews on ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN: | Write a review |
| Author: Dayton Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-11-07 16:22:12 This is an example of a very old-fashioned journal of botany. This journal focuses on the quality of the published articles more than the number published per issue. Relatively straightforward submission/publication process.  (0) Thank | Dayton  |
| Author: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-30 11:33:36 If conditions allow, try to supplement the experiment as much as possible; if not, consider carefully and provide reasons for defense, but a modest and cautious tone is essential. After all, there is a certain rejection rate for major revisions (0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 |
| Author: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-30 10:04:19 When responding to the comments of reviewers, all questions must be answered point by point without omission; attempt to meet the experimental needs suggested in the comments, provide reasonable reasons if unable to meet them; cited literature recommended by reviewers must be referenced and thoroughly discussed; when submitting the revised manuscript, make sure to check the areas corrected in the initial draft. If you agree with the modifications suggested by the editor when replying to the editorial comments, simply accept the modifications. If you disagree, write your reasons directly below the comments and then provide feedback to the editor. In case of disagreement between both parties, negotiate further (0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 |
| Author: 魂魄彦露 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-28 13:42:53 The reviewers requested that I conduct additional experiments, but I have already run out of samples/ the experiment is already completed. Would my paper be rejected if I directly state that my samples are used up? (0) Thank | 魂魄彦露 |
| Author: 上清雨真 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-28 12:10:56 What is the difference between responding to reviewers' comments and responding to journal editors' comments? (0) Thank | 上清雨真 |
| Author: 水月佳鑫 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-11-07 12:00:36 Review speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: It is also a very old botanical journal. Compared to the quantity of articles, more emphasis is placed on the quality of articles. It's not easy to be accepted (0) Thank | 水月佳鑫 |
| Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-07-18 23:15:10 We can only hope for the best next year, after all, as long as the overall trend is upward, there is no need to worry. Even if it only increases a little each year, it will accumulate over time, which is still good (0) Thank | 凌霄高洁 |
| First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |