The level of the journal is average, and two articles have been published in it, and the impact factor has risen a bit fast. I know a senior who has a relationship with the editorial board of this journal. He said that it would be acceptable if basically the work was complete, and the requirements for innovation were not high. The quality of the articles was uneven. In recent years, the main work of this journal should be how to increase the impact factor as soon as possible. Please don’t blame me and I just tell the truth.

(11) Thank | Anonymous

Rejection was received within one week. No significant steps forward in the field of optical methods applied to engineering problems can be found in such a submission. Then it is recommended to transferred to journals focusing on antennas and optical communications.

(0) Thank | dreger

A great journal, always publishes many high-quality papers that don’t lose to the papers in Q1 journals. I submitted the manuscript twice. The first time the reviewers did not seem to be very expert, raising a dozen comments, and it was rejected. However, after I resubmitted the manuscript, attaching my responding to last review comments, new reviewers were arranged. Then it was accepted with minor revisions again. The second submission went smoothly and it was accepted after a minor revision. My direction is 3D measurement.

(17) Thank | Admirer

This journal is really fast, about a week to reply, but my paper was rejected. I admit that my paper structure really needs improvement

(0) Thank | Anonymous

6.2. We 6.3 we have not submitted for review for two weeks.

(0) Thank | 浑水摸鱼打老虎

0606 必要的审查已完成

Reviews required for 0606 have been completed.

(0) Thank | 深度学习不深度

Brother, may I ask which editor you have chosen?

(0) Thank | Peter

6.1with editor 6.5reject
The reason for rejection of the article on infrared optics is that it does not fall within the scope of the journal.

(0) Thank | 感谢认可我的论文

Excuse me, are the reviewers fast in reviewing manuscripts for this journal recently?

(0) Thank | accept_小狗

02/05/2025 With Editor 
02/11/2025 With Editor 
02/17/2025 Under Review 
02/19/2025 Under Review 
03/12/2025 Under Review 
03/30/2025 Under Review 
04/03/2025 Required Reviews Completed 
04/07/2025 Decision in Process 
04/09/2025 Revise 
04/23/2025 With Editor 
04/24/2025 With Editor 
04/28/2025 Under Review 
05/12/2025 Required Reviews Complete
05/19/2025 Decision in Process 
05/23/2025 Accept

(2) Thank | Andy

The editors are super nice and efficient, taking less than two months from submission to acceptance.

(0) Thank | 小徐论文百投百中

0519 under review.

(0) Thank | 深度学习不深度

How long after receiving will the proof be ready?

(0) Thank | 岳123

Not necessarily, I have also been in the second round of review with the editor for a week.

(0) Thank | xuaner1111

4.30 Return for revisions; 5.2 The editor has not responded, will it be sent for a second review?

(0) Thank | LaiWZ

0410 Submit
0411 with editor
No news for a month now.

(0) Thank | 深度学习不深度

It seems like the speed has slowed down recently.

(0) Thank | 学吊一枚

I haven't heard anything from my editor for two weeks.

(0) Thank | 深度学习不深度

Within one week with the editor.

(0) Thank | chen

Excuse me, how long have you been with the editor?

(0) Thank | 深度学习不深度

February 9, 2025 - Submission
March 17, 2025 - Minor revisions
April 15, 2025 - Acceptance
April 22, 2025 - Publication

(0) Thank | chen

Will the impact factor of the journal drop to the third quartile next year as it has been decreasing year by year?

(0) Thank | Andy

Hasn't it been submitted for review for a month yet?

(0) Thank | 好发发发发

The AIGC test is not very accurate, as it is possible for reviewers to only use AI for polishing and still be detected. Therefore, you can report the situation, but the results are uncertain.

(0) Thank | lin_sen6

One of the reviewers clearly provided a review generated by AI (confirmed by AIGC detection). Can we address this issue in the editor's rebuttal?

(0) Thank | wzaxl123