Have you invested? Any follow-up? Can we invest in the direction of tumors?

(0) Thank | 中原梓瑶

This varies from person to person. If the main results have been achieved, it is generally recommended to start with the results. If the main results are still in progress, it is okay to start with the methods and introduction

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

It is recommended to start writing the article after completing the main results section, but you can also start planning the article after obtaining the main phenotype data or designing the study

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

At what stage of the experiment is it appropriate to start writing the article?

(0) Thank | 龙鳞孝礼

What is the general writing sequence for a research article?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

How long does it take to go from with editor to the next stage? I submitted an article to a magazine and it was rejected by the editor after half a month, as I am eager to graduate

(0) Thank | 桃花长永

Is it very difficult? Can we communicate?

(0) Thank | 龙鳞书南

Hello, can you provide a contact information?

lixiongwap 2017-01-10: Research direction: neurotoxicology; Acceptance rate: about 75% Review time: about 1 month SCI (2015): 2.738 SCI (2014): 3.379 Finally accepted. Let's talk about my feelings. I am now in my second year of graduate school, studying neurotoxicology. This is my first English article and my first SCI. First, let's talk about my overall impression of this journal. It's pretty good in toxicology. Toxicology Zone 2. Last year was a 3-point journal. This year it dropped a bit. However, being able to publish several 2-point articles in the master's research stage is quite good. Both the editor-in-chief and the responsible associate editor are good. They have a good attitude. Reviewers are very meticulous. Small issues may be pointed out. But the reviewers' attitude is good. As long as you answer their questions seriously. Here is the timeline of my submission this time. 2016.8.9: First submission 2016.8.31: First review completed. Provided major revisions 2016.11.27: Uploaded first revised manuscript 2016.12.5: Second review completed. Not major revisions, mainly language issues. Spent $285 at Elsevier Webshop for proofreading. 2017.1.4: Uploaded second revised manuscript 2017.1.10: Third review completed. A few small issues. A quick fix 2017.1.10 evening: Uploaded the manuscript after minor revisions. Accepted in less than an hour

(0) Thank | 龙鳞书南

This magazine is so unfair, the first review took six months, the second review took two months, and then it was rejected with unreasonable reasons. It's really speechless

(0) Thank | 西风宏峻

3 points margin, hoping to maintain stability, a slight increase is also good

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 75.0 Experience Sharing: Finally got accepted, let's talk about my feelings. I am currently in my second year of graduate study, majoring in neurotoxicology. This is my first English article and my first SCI publication. First, let's talk about the overall impression of this journal. In the field of toxicology, it's quite good, a 2nd tier journal in toxicology. Last year it was rated as a 3, but dropped a bit this year. However, I think it's good to be able to publish several 2nd tier papers during the master's degree. The editor-in-chief and the responsible associate editor are nice, with a good attitude. The reviewers are very detailed, pointing out minor issues, but as long as you carefully address their questions. Below is the timeline of my submission. 2016.8.9 First submission 2016.8.31 First review comments, major revision needed 2016.11.27 Uploaded the first revised manuscript 2016.12.5 Second review completed, not major revisions but mainly language issues, spent 285USD on Elsevier Webshop for polishing. 2017.1.4 Uploaded the second revised manuscript 2017.1.10 Third review completed, a few minor issues, fixed them 2017.1.10 at night, uploaded the revised manuscript. In less than an hour, Accept

(0) Thank | 北陆晗琴

Review speed: 2.0 
Sharing experience: Submitted on March 7, 2016, revised on April 30, returned for revision 10 days later, minor revisions on July 13, returned on August 5, accepted on September 11, signed a copyright transfer agreement on the 12th, proofs were provided on the 13th. The average review time is 7-8 weeks. The editor’s attitude is very friendly, but the "with editor" time lasted for a month. Urged once for the manuscript, got a response the next day saying it had been sent to three reviewers for review, it just didn't get updated in time. However, for those who are in a hurry to graduate and need the paper, I do not recommend submitting. It took me a total of half a year from submission to acceptance. The reviewers asked very professional questions, focusing mainly on basic medical subjects, especially pharmacology, but they also helped me clarify many thoughts. It is recommended to have a professional review the paper before submission

(0) Thank | 是你的映亦呀

I submitted it on 10.12, and heard back from the editor on 10.16. There has been no update since then, I don't know if it's normal or not

(0) Thank | 慧俊小仙女

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: Submitted twice, rejected twice

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Submitted twice, the first submission was rejected, found out that the editor-in-chief personally rejected it. Considered the magazine's attitude towards articles is very good, the second submission was accepted after minor revisions, first review took 3 months, second review took 1 week. Great magazine!

(0) Thank | 龙爪尔露

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) Thank | Anonymous

High requirements for Neurotoxicology major!

(0) Thank | 风啸承德

Research focus: toxicology

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission success rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Articles on neurotoxicity are easier to be accepted, the journal is good, and the speed of review is relatively fast

(0) Thank | 慕蕊来了