I don’t know why my submission this time is not as efficient as the previous people said. It may be mainly because reviewers are harder to find. It took 1–2 months to find reviewers. After waiting for another two months, the review comments were received. There was no major problem. It took a week to process the review opinions. And then it took nearly two months after resubmission. If you are anxious to publish a paper for graduation, you may need to be cautious. If the direction is relatively biased, it may be difficult to find reviewers; of course, if the quality of your work is relatively good, you can have a try.

(1) Thank | vitaszzshine

Slowly, slowly, and slowly. No editor had been invited for two weeks. After sending a reminder letter, the manuscript was under review. Then there was no news for more than a month. Then I sent a reminder letter again. He said that he can’t find the corresponding reviewer. He added that he found the second reviewer for whose reply he was waiting for. Again, he said that he was still looking for reviewers now. I was speechless that it has been three months. He withdrew the manuscript without a result three months later. I am really speechless. Wasted me three months.

(1) Thank | 被科研吊打的医学狗

The efficiency of this journal is relatively high. The response of first submission was given in a month, with comments from two reviewers. The first one pointed out a lot of problems, including language issues, and the second one raised relatively few problems. The time given for revision is 2 months, and then the experiment is completed and the language was modified. After the resubmission, the response was given again one month later. The time given for revision is still 2 months. This time the first reviewer had basically no comments, but was very careful, and helped to revise it word by word. The second person pointed out a lot of problems. The editor of the journal said that this was the last chance, and then we revised it carefully. Thanks to LetPub's help, whose editor was still very responsible. I asked them to fix it for me several times, and finally returned the article within the time required. This time they gave response very soon, saying that there was no problem any more. In fact, it is much better to polish the language first, and in this way, others can read it clearly. It is more convincing to indicate who helped polishing the language when it had been polished.

(0) Thank | 小雪雪

The research focuses on neurodegenerative diseases, neurodevelopment, and drug treatment. The review time is about one month. And the reception rate is about 50%. Although the impact factor is not very high, it is still a good old-fashioned journal. If the work is okay, there are some innovations, and the data is detailed and full, it is not difficult to get published!

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Old journals, medical imaging processing and diagnostic direction. 
Submission to acceptance takes half a year, submission in June, review within half a month, review process takes two months, revisions in August, second revisions in October, feedback within a week, acceptance two months later.
Both editors and reviewers are very meticulous and serious. The only downside is the slow speed of revisions, which always takes around two months.

(1) Thank | maibeibu

What type of article did you submit?

(0) Thank | 让我毕个业吧！

Just invested today, the outcome is unknown.

(0) Thank | 让我毕个业吧！

Reviewing in September has been a long time, and there has been no progress on one of the review comments. How should I ask to push for progress? Does anyone know?

(0) Thank | Cui

Can I ask everyone, is inviting reviewers very slow? It has been several days and we still haven't received any feedback from the reviewers. How many days does it usually take for everyone?

(0) Thank | Cui

Just submitted my paper, went through technical review, then with editor, now it's under review. Is there any place to see more detailed results? Which stage are we at now?

(0) Thank | Cui

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Research focus: experience sharing on cerebrovascular diseases
Comments: A well-established journal, currently rated 2.9, falls in the fourth category of its field. Is it still considered a third-tier journal? Will it be downgraded?

(0) Thank | 睿达小公主

You can check if the editorial team of the journal has experts in the relevant field, or find experts who have published similar peer-reviewed articles in databases, or even reach out to the big names cited in the reference articles.

(0) Thank | 辉夜玄穆

When submitting manuscripts, do you let yourself choose the editor? Does anyone have any experience or recommendations?

(0) Thank | 普鲁登斯齐默尔曼

Sorry, the person above me, I replied to the wrong journal.

(0) Thank | 阿h

When submitting a manuscript, how do I choose single-blind review, as it seems to default to double-blind review?

(0) Thank | 阿h

The accepted manuscript was quickly proofread, and different versions will be published in PubMed as the journal progresses, until the printing. After printing, it still cannot be retrieved in the core journals of WOS. This year, the JCR zone has been upgraded, but the impact factor has decreased.

(0) Thank | ly879752577

I submitted a meta-analysis to this journal, and one reviewer has reviewed it. However, I have not been able to find another reviewer yet. I wonder, how many reviewers are usually needed for a meta-analysis in this journal?

(0) Thank | wfZDX

Can I ask the host if the proofreading notice has been sent out? We have accepted the April issue but have not received any proofreading notice

(0) Thank | 来楠楠

I would like to ask the host, have you notified the submission deadline? I have been admitted for over two months and have not been notified about revising the manuscript

(0) Thank | 来楠楠

I want to ask, how long does it take to receive the proofreading after being hired? I have been hired for two months without any notification for proofreading

(0) Thank | 来楠楠

The journal is very responsible, but the review process is quite long. After a major revision, the paper will be accepted directly

(0) Thank | 青鑫

The speed of journal external review is acceptable, with results given in 1.5 months. The first revision fee is processed in 25 days, but each process is slightly slow. It generally takes 3-5 days for the editorial team to process submissions or revisions. Review comments are detailed and mainly focused on meeting the journal's format requirements. After adding experiments and making two revisions, the second revision focused on formatting changes. The editor made a decision directly after the second revision, overall experience was satisfactory. Although full films were requested, only pieced together full films were provided, and some were not fully pieced together, the editor did not criticize

(0) Thank | ly879752577

After submission, the request for resubmission of the Ethical Statement indicates whether the information from the Animal Experiment Ethics Committee needs to be included. Or should additional information such as author consent and data availability be added?

(0) Thank | 极乐晟华

The review process is very slow, taking over 2 months each time, and the most outrageous part is that after going through major and minor revisions for half a year, the paper was ultimately rejected. I don't understand their thought process. If they think my paper is not suitable, why bother with minor revisions?

(2) Thank | sjyelva

What is the reason for the rejection? How many reviewers? Did all the reviewers reject it?

(0) Thank | may_lsj