The editor has been holding onto it for a month, so if you're in a hurry, please don't submit this.

(0) Thank | sssskkfnnv

Could you please let me know if there is any update? How long will it take for the review process to be completed?

(0) Thank | sssskkfnnv

After submitting to 22 outlets, there has been no follow-up since the 25th with the editor. Can you please give me some feedback on whether it's suitable or not? I've been waiting anxiously.

(0) Thank | sssskkfnnv

It has been over 3 months since the first review, and there is still no result. The number of invited reviewers has increased from 2 to 3 to 5 to 7 to 8 to 9 to over 10. Have I violated any heavenly laws in my article? If it works, it works; if it doesn't, it doesn't. Everyone should be cautious and watch out for lightning.

(0) Thank | Du

I have also updated my date today. What does that mean?

(0) Thank | Lucky_accept

Excuse me, how long has the editor been assigned? It's been about 17 days already.

(0) Thank | Lucky_accept

It has been over 20 days since I submitted my manuscript, and the assigned editor has remained unchanged. The date was updated once in the middle, but it still shows the same status. What does this mean?

(0) Thank | lili

How long did it take you to submit and review the submission?

(0) Thank | lili

It took two months from submission to decision after review. The reviewers gave some vague comments, and the editor rejected it, which was quite strange. At first, I thought it was just minor revisions based on the length of the email, but the overall experience was mediocre

(1) Thank | Omeprazole

After my paper was under review, it has now gone back to "editor assigned" status for over half a month now... How about yours?

(0) Thank | xyc049110

Has anyone submitted to this journal recently? How long does the "Editor Assigned" status typically last?

(0) Thank | lili

10.31 Submitted to journal
11.02 Editor assigned
11.03 Under Review
12.08 Major Revise Several comments, very insightful, greatly improved the article
1.17 Submitted to journal
1.17 Send back to author Incorrect format, need Word not pdf
2.13 Submitted to journal
2.14 Editor assigned
2.14 Under Review
3.13 Minor Revise Just a few minor issues
3.14 Submitted to journal
3.14 Editor assigned
3.19 Accept
The editor processed it quite quickly, review speed is around 1-2 months, wishing the journal to keep improving

(0) Thank | neverland

Is it not in line with the theme?

(0) Thank | SCI

Submission rejected after 15 days, the review process is relatively fast

(0) Thank | huhuoyou1029

Is it necessary to upload experimental data for this journal?

(0) Thank | 活人妙珍

What does it mean when it changes from "under review" back to "editor assigned"? ?

(0) Thank | 念珊大叔

Submitted on 01 May 2022, revised on 18 May, feedback received on 08 June, and assigned to an editor on 10 June. The status has remained unchanged since then

(0) Thank | 书生怜蕾

How about you? My status changed back to "reviewer assigned" after being "under review". It's been 10 days and nothing has happened

(0) Thank | 念珊大叔

It's been 10 days since I submitted my manuscript, but it's still "Editor Invited." I wonder if anyone else has had this experience. Thank you

(0) Thank | 重阳绮丽

Submission Completed - Formatting Review - Initial Editing - Peer Review - Review Completed - Final Editing - Author Revision

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Almost all freely submitted manuscripts that meet the academic standards for publication after review need to be returned to the authors for revisions of expression and formatting before publication. This includes compressing the length of the article, redesigning tables, improving the quality of illustrations, restricting the use of irregular abbreviations, etc. However, manuscripts that are returned to authors for revisions do not necessarily mean that the article has been accepted; the final acceptance of the article depends on whether the author's modifications to the critical content and presentation style meet the requirements of the reviewers and editors. 
Materials typically returned to authors for revisions include the original manuscript, reviewers' comments, and a covering letter from the editor. When authors receive the revised manuscript, they should carefully read the covering letter and reviewers' comments, and then consider whether they can or are willing to accept the suggestions from the reviewers or editor and make revisions. The likelihood of acceptance can be seen from the responses in the letter from the editor and the revised feedback from the reviewers. Revisions should not be rushed; authors should carefully read and understand the reviewers' questions, respond to each reviewer's comments, indicate specifically the changes made in the revised manuscript, and write back to the editor expressing gratitude for the suggestions and indicating the reasons for any parts that were not modified

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the process of peer review?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

What is the process of refunds?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 75.0
Experience Sharing: 12.04 submission 1.26 minor revision 2.3 revise 2.18 accept 2.25 online

(0) Thank | 雨巷少年兰兰

Don't worry, this magazine is quite fast, keep it up

(0) Thank | Noel Morgan