How are things going now?

(0) Thank | 终幕甲子

It's been two months since the second review, and I still haven't heard anything....I sent an email to ask, and the editor said the reviewer hasn't replied yet. Is this normal?

(0) Thank | 无相文瑞

Present the research results in the order of research questions and hypotheses, or alternatively, structure the research results according to the sequence of research methods. Using chronological order, arranging by importance, or categorizing by different themes are all efficient methods. When deciding on the structure for presenting research results, it is important to consider the audience, basis, and most importantly, the research objectives

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Delete unnecessary parts based on the central content of the article

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What kind of logical order should be followed when organizing the results?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

I have too many results, the article can't contain them all. What should I do?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: After the magazine changed editors, I started submitting protocols this year and submitted a meta protocol. It was rejected within less than a month

(0) Thank | 魔都浓绮

The reviewers of the magazine are very fair and professional, with high requirements for experiments. An article submitted in September received major revisions in October and was revised by December. It was accepted in January. The editor's handling was also very efficient

(0) Thank | 百花耀择

Gastroenterology and Hepatology journal ranked 23rd

(0) Thank | 彤蕊小可爱

@zhanglei0411 switched to a journal with an impact factor of 2.7, and got accepted within a month from submission. May I ask which journal it is? 
Research focus: gastrointestinal motility stress 
Acceptance rate: about 25% 
Submitted an article on a very relevant topic, but got rejected shortly after, they said it was not suitable for their journal. Didn't even send it for review, felt quite arrogant. Switched to a journal with an impact factor of 2.7, got accepted within a month. Personally, I feel that this journal has very high requirements for experimental methods

(0) Thank | 岭南雅茹

What magazine did you switch to?

(0) Thank | 血天梦桃

The review speed is very fast, the review comments are very pertinent and careful.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review speed is quite fast, the review comments are very pertinent, and careful

(0) Thank | 巴蜀清雅

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Submitted on June 26, rejected on August 23. The comments from the two reviewers were very professional. It seems that this journal has high standards for experiments

(0) Thank | 北陆安吉

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: The review speed is quite fast. I submitted on November 25, 2015, and received a rejection with a lot of suggestions from the reviewers on December 26, 2015. The suggestions were pertinent and thorough

(0) Thank | Bowen Eugene

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: I submitted an article that closely matched the direction, but it was rejected within a few days, saying it was not suitable for their magazine to publish. They didn't even send it for review, which felt very arrogant. I switched to another journal with a 2.7 rating, and it was accepted within a month. Personally, I feel that this journal has very high requirements for experimental methods

(0) Thank | 凌霄冉冉

The exact message is 3.349

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Research focus: Digestive diseases; Gastrointestinal tract

(0) Thank | 巴蜀梦山