The article was submitted in April, and the result was returned in the mid-May, and minor revision was required. One week after the submission of reply, it was accepted directly. The main reason why I chose this journal is that I usually read the articles and think the direction is relatively appropriate. I feel the editor and reviewers were very professional and efficient, and I don't know what happened to those who said the review was slow in the comments.

(7) Thank | 不带们

Although the cycle is long, the journal is very rigorous, and the three-page full of comments from reviewers is also of great benefit to the improvement of the quality of the article. When can we settle down to do scientific research? Does this epidemic help? I look forward to it. I also look forward that this journal could be a classic, and it can leave some excellent works after the nano is no longer a research hot.

(2) Thank | yuzhangxueren

The process is slow. First of all, the reviewers were very professional and helpful. They were all established in the medical field. However, my work uses new nano-compounds. One reviewer asked me what is the use of this? He doesn't care whether it is new or not. He only cares about whether he can use it in the future. What is better than traditional materials?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2021.12.3    submitted to the journal
2021.12.13  under review
2022.2.13    under review
2022.2.27    under review
2022.4.17    under review
2022.4.24    under review
2022.5.8      major revision (60 days)
2022.6.9      revision submitted
2022.7.6      accept

(1) Thank | 迷鹿南北

Received the review results four months after submission. The first time it was sent back for revisions, it took a month for the editor to put it "under review." It took them three weeks to notify me of the completed required review. Now, it has been a month since the second revision was submitted, and it is still "with editor." I sent an email to urge them, and received a sincere reply from someone. However, a week has passed and it is still "with editor." The entire process has already been eight months, and I still can't see any hope of acceptance.

(0) Thank | lierdan

Every week, there would be changes on Monday mornings

(0) Thank | 风陵梓琬

Submitted at the end of September, it took a month and a half to wait for two reviewers willing to review. The received feedback seemed like an automated email, with mainly official statements at the beginning, stating that they couldn't accept the current version. However, if the revised version based on the reviewers' comments is submitted again, they would reconsider acceptance. The email also included minor suggestions from the two reviewers. No additional experiments were requested. After two weeks of revision, it was resubmitted and accepted the next morning.

(0) Thank | 荷兰菜弟

How long does it usually take for the editor to respond after a revision?

(0) Thank | 睿诚小哥哥

July 6, 2022. It has been a tough eight months, but we made it through

(0) Thank | 风陵梓琬

Submitted on 2021.12.3, under review on 12.13, status updated on 2022.2.13 but still under review; updated status on 2.27, still under review afterwards; updated status on 2022.4.17, still under review; updated status on 2022.4.24, but still under review

(0) Thank | 风陵梓琬

Submitted on 3rd December 2021, under review on 13th December, status updated on 13th February 2022 but still under review, updated again on 27th February but still under review after that. It is now 6th April 2022, no news yet. Updated status on 17th April, still under review. It has been four and a half months since submission. Can anyone explain?

(0) Thank | 风陵梓琬

Submitted on 3rd December 2021, under review on 13th December, status updated on 13th February 2022 but still under review. Updated status again on 27th February, but still under review since then. It is now 6th April 2022, still no news. It has been four months since submission. Can anyone help explain?

(0) Thank | 风陵梓琬

Could you please tell me whether the editor replied quickly to your email prompting for submission?

(0) Thank | 风陵梓琬

I submitted my manuscript on 1/23 and have not received any response yet. I sent an email inquiring about it and was told that two reviewers have agreed to review it but have not completed the review

(0) Thank | 骨架经略

The status was updated to 2.27 again, but it is still under review, it has been three months

(0) Thank | 风陵梓琬

Now it's in the review status, it has been three months, but it's still in review

(0) Thank | 风陵梓琬

Are you submitting now?

(0) Thank | 震雷自明

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 
Research focus: Nano-carriers 
Experience sharing: Submitted on 2021.12.3, under review on 12.13, status updated on 2022.2.13 but still under review. Any experienced experts to guide me on what's going on?

(0) Thank | 风陵梓琬

The model diagram can clearly and directly display the overall idea of the article

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

A model diagram is a depiction of your theoretical model. This diagram is optional in submissions

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Is a model diagram necessary?

(0) Thank | 上清雨真

Is the use of models beneficial or detrimental to reviewers' attitudes toward manuscripts?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

How long after you submit your manuscript will you receive the number, and how long will it take to be reviewed?

(0) Thank | nanor

Seeing that everyone says it's right to be slow, after submission, the manuscript is not assigned to the editor for numbering, and the impact factor is declining. The handling of manuscripts is not proactive, so it can only be relegated to the third tier. I suggest that everyone should not submit anymore.

(0) Thank | nanor

Does this magazine require a layout fee?

(0) Thank | 哇哦哦