The editing is slow, but the attitude is very good. It process took more than 11 months. The reviewers are professional. The recent decline in IF is estimated to be related to the slow review and publication speed. The content emphasizes medicine, and the nano part can be new or old.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Why is this magazine's circulation dropping so drastically?

(0) Thank | 听听婷

Have you applied for expedited review?

(0) Thank | 璃月逸春

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 
Research focus: Nanoparticles 
Experience sharing: The review speed is acceptable, the editor is very careful, and the requirements are high. Overall, it is a very good article.

(0) Thank | 书雪超级甜

Is there anyone who can check the status of my submission, which was submitted to the journal?

(0) Thank | 艾琳伦纳德

Excuse me for the inconvenience, may I ask how long your submission to the Journal has been in progress?

(0) Thank | 艾琳伦纳德

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 50.0
Research Focus: Nanocarriers; Tumor Targeted Therapy; Sharing Experience in Nanomedicine: Submitted on June 2nd, reviewed on June 23rd, received reviewer comments on July 10th, both reviewers suggested minor revisions for acceptance after revision on July 21st, revised on July 28th, editor requested adjustments to reference formatting on July 30th, accepted officially on August 4th. Overall, the speed was relatively fast

(0) Thank | 乐咏小仙女

It took 2 months from submission to acceptance, which is considered fast. The reviewers were chosen by myself.
June 2: Submitted
June 23: Sent for review
July 10: Both reviewers suggested minor revisions before acceptance
July 21: Returned
July 28: Revised reference formatting
July 30: Revised
August 4: Officially accepted

(0) Thank | 蜗牛不会飞

Very good

(0) Thank | deyu zhu

The reputation of this magazine seems to have declined a bit.

(0) Thank | 张Dr

When did you submit?

(0) Thank | Virgil House

Research focus: Nano carriers; Nanomedicine; Sharing nano experiences: It has been almost two weeks since the return and repair

(0) Thank | 敏思小娘子

Research focus: Nanomedicine; Nanotechnology experience sharing: It has been almost two weeks since the rework, waiting patiently

(0) Thank | 敏思小娘子

The reviewer is quite capable; they revised 40 pages in 6 months. Submitting to this journal requires courage and patience...

(0) Thank | 听听婷

I have been applying for over 20 days, and it has been under consideration. I chose the non-OA option.

(0) Thank | 听听婷

It's been 2 weeks, how have you been?

(0) Thank | Bernie Juliet

I'm in the same situation too, how about you?

(0) Thank | Bernie Juliet

Research Purpose, Process, and Findings Summary
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of social media on mental health in teenagers. The study was conducted through a survey distributed to a sample of high school students. The findings revealed a significant correlation between excessive social media use and an increase in anxiety and depression symptoms among teenagers.

Discussion of Data Results
The data results from this study support the existing literature on the negative effects of social media on mental health. Previous research has shown that prolonged use of social media can lead to feelings of inadequacy, social isolation, and poor self-esteem. These factors can contribute to mental health issues such as anxiety and depression.

Evaluation and Discussion of Study Contribution and Significance
This study contributes to the growing body of research on the relationship between social media use and mental health in teenagers. By providing empirical evidence of the negative effects of social media on mental health, this study highlights the need for further investigation and intervention to promote healthy social media habits among teenagers.

Conclusion and Future Research Directions
In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of addressing the impact of social media on mental health in teenagers. Future research should focus on developing strategies and interventions to help teenagers navigate social media in a way that promotes positive mental health outcomes

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Contrary to the writing of the discussion section and introduction, the structure of the discussion section is a reverse funnel, extending from small to large. Starting from the rationality of each research result, anomalies, and the principles behind them, gradually delve into analysis, and after laying the groundwork, naturally lead to the main conclusions of the paper for discussion, and finally expand the analysis, pointing out the importance/significance/universality/application value of the research

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Discussing how to write?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

What is the difference between an introduction and a discussion?

(0) Thank | 北国博达

I submitted my article to nanomedicine 3 weeks ago, and it is still under consideration. The status shows ADM: Not Assigned. Can you please provide more information on the current process?

(0) Thank | 断刀思天

Is the cost of fast-track publication high? Or are there any conditions, thank you!

(0) Thank | 艳杰Sama

It's been 2 weeks, the status is under consideration, but ADM has still not been assigned; is there no hope?

(0) Thank | 太山文光

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Success Rate: 75.0 Focus on Research Area: Formulations ; Experience in Medicinal Chemistry: Share your article submission experience

(0) Thank | 摔碑亦丝