The article was submitted on March 29; The status review completed was updated several times since June; Major revision was required on July 15; It was submitted on July 30; During the period, the status review completed was also updated 3 times; It was accepted on October 16. Summary: The review of this journal was relatively slow. There were 3 reviewers, one of them raised more than 10 comments, and the comments were very pertinent; the comments raised by the other two reviewers were minor issues; the editor required major revision. It was truly completed until the status review completed was updated 3 times. After all, I am happy for the acceptance in the end. It is not recommended to those who are rush to graduate, because it is really relatively slow.

(7) Thank | XILLV

The manuscript was submitted on October 22, 2019, and it was sent for review until 2020.3.5. I urged it for several times in the middle, and there were always replies, but it had never been sent for review. On May 21, the opinions for major revision were received. There were three experts, one accepted it; one gave 11 comments, pointed the advantages of the article, but also mentioned the shortcomings; one gave 12 comments, saying that it can be reviewed again after revision. After half a month of revision, and delays due to other things in the middle, the revised version was submitted until 6.17. I received an email notifying of a direct acceptance yesterday. I have submitted two articles for this journal. The first time it took 2 months to receive the first review result. This time it was so slow because it was with editor for four and a half months before being sent for review. It took 2 months for the editor to give the first review opinions, and the second review result was received within one and a half months. It took 9 and a half months and finally we got a good result. Therefore, the review cycle really depends on the speed of the editor and your reviewers. The paper should be written down-to-earth, well-founded, innovative, and the English writing should be good, and then the chances of being accepted will be very high.

(8) Thank | victor123

The paper was submitted on April 17, editor assigned on April 20, under review on May 15, and then the revision comments were received by email on June 29. The revision was submitted one month later, and the notification of acceptance was received by email within one week. One of my seniors also submitted to this journal, but the editor was changed halfway, and he waited 7 months before receiving the comments for revision. There are three reviewers for my paper. The first one gave me a detailed comment, and the second one was suspected to be given by his students, where I was asked me why not make this comparison, or why not use that method. I obviously have done them. The third reviewer talked about the experimental part in detail, and asked me to add a more convincing comparative experiment. My English level is very, very poor. The sentences were translated and written by Google Translate, and the methods and experiments are not clearly stated. It is said that this journal will give comments for revision regardless of whether it is going to be accepted or not. Although the email does not say that it will not be accepted, I seriously doubt it will be rejected. But in the spirit of snatching at straws, we almost rewrote the entire paper, which was finally accepted. I think it should because of the epidemic, and there are few people submitting papers, so the editor is a little anxious. Thus, he didn't reject me at the beginning...

(5) Thank | ahaha

I submitted a manuscript in mid-June; by mid-September it was under review; by mid-late October the review was completed. But I didn’t get it back until early November. I submitted it after 3 days of revision and received the notice of acceptance by the end of November. Five reviewers were assigned and four submitted the review results. Three of the reviewers did not raise any doubts. One of the reviewers raised many basic knowledge questions.  Considering that comprehensive multimedia journals are inevitably assigned to non-small field counterparts, they have re-submitted the papers after explaining the big and small problems in the response letter, and they have been accepted in less than two weeks. Tip: Some reviewers may wish you to "reference" some of the latest (unrelated) documents, but it’s most important to address the major issues.

(8) Thank | 风雨云

Shaking) This year's Chinese Academy of Sciences journal ranking, this journal won't be unranked, right...

(0) Thank | ywze1998

On October 22, 2024, they were kicked out of SCI, and the articles they received afterwards were no longer considered as SCI.

(0) Thank | 认真科研

xxxx

(0) Thank | bids

Why does it affect blind review?

(0) Thank | 瓦妮莎

What are you talking about? I just searched it on the web.

(0) Thank | 瓦妮莎

The latest notice on 10.22, this journal has been kicked out of SCI.

(4) Thank | Diyide

The latest notice on October 22nd, this journal has been removed from SCI.

(0) Thank | Diyide

My article has been under review for almost eight months and is still in the review process. Is there any way to withdraw it? But I heard that the article can only be withdrawn after the review comments are received.

(0) Thank | 魂汐

Does anyone know when the on-hold can be lifted? Just got hired and feeling conflicted.

(0) Thank | 归零，开始

How can I withdraw my submission?

(0) Thank | 认真科研

This journal has been put on hold. How can I withdraw my submission?

(0) Thank | 认真科研

Accepted six months, may I ask if traditional subscriptions and OA affect retrieval time?

(5) Thank | anruojun

The journal has been on hold for six months, is it done now?

(0) Thank | enjoy123

Not clear yet, just sent the proofread manuscript yesterday

(0) Thank | 1433223_

Hello, may I ask if you are currently searchable in Web of Science?

(0) Thank | lao

Urgent students need not rush:
2023.9.6 Submission
2023.9.7 Second submission
2023.9.8 Editor Assigned
2023.11.2 Under Review
2024.2.26 Major Revision
2024-03-20 Revision Submitted
2024-03-21 Editor Assigned
2024-04-27 Under Review
2024-05-28 Accept
2024-06-9 Sign copyright agreement
2024-06-9 Proofreading (Choose traditional subscription, non-color printing

(0) Thank | 1433223_

I submitted a manuscript to this journal (MTAP-D-22-04501) and although more than 500 days have passed, there has been only one reviewer return. I wrote to the journal and Springer Nature many times (Ticket IDs [#8490571, #8523902], #8490571), they kept saying they would speed it up etc. But they were never interested.  Open access articles on similar topics were published in a few months. Finally, I had to withdraw my paper when I finally gave up hope.

(0) Thank | cagatay

I submitted in March and sent a follow-up email to the editor two weeks ago. They replied with some generic response and it still hasn't been sent for review. How about you, OP?

(0) Thank | nulllll

Is the OP currently under review? Any results?

(0) Thank | nulllll

Have you got the results now, OP?

(0) Thank | nulllll

How to withdraw submission when the result is unknown??? It seems like it has been warned

(0) Thank | 认真科研