I submitted an image processing-related article. The editor-in-chief was especially good. The author was changed during the period. Every time the editor replied to emails very quickly. In particular, the reviewers I fortunately met were also very helpful, who also gave the correct expressions. The process is as follows: 2019.05.03, submitted; 2019.07.11, with editor; 2019.08.02, revised and resubmitted; 2019.09.24, under review; 2020.01.11, major revision; 2020.03.06, with editor; 2020.03.15, under review; 2020.05.11, minor revision; 2020.05.26, with editor; 2020.06.05, under review; 2020.08.19, with editor; 2020.08.27, accept. It can be searched on the Web of Science in late September 2020. There was no review fee in the whole process.

(5) Thank | 天山雪豹

It's been almost a month, and there is no news at all.

(0) Thank | zzz11gd

In less than a month.

(0) Thank | Ma_duidui

- Submitted the initial draft in December of 24.
- Returned for major revisions in March of 25, with over 30 comments from two reviewers, mostly requesting additional experiments.
- Another round of major revisions in June of 25, this time with three new reviewers requesting more experiments. Some even requested experiments unrelated to the experimental methods (such as the impact of optimizer selection and learning rate on performance).
- The editor's processing speed is getting slower each time, the first round was handled in a week, the second round took 10 days, and now the third round has been sitting for two weeks with no progress. It is truly torturous, if I have to revise again, I will just submit to another journal.

(0) Thank | lycutter

How long has it been for everyone? It's been a month, why haven't we received any news yet? Did it get lost in the mail?

(0) Thank | 芜湖起飞11111

Submitted on 27th February 2025
Technical review passed on 28th February
Editor assigned on 28th February
Editing on 22nd March
Two reviewers invited on 22nd March
Reviewers accepted on 23rd March
Reviewers provided feedback on 24th March
Major revisions on 17th April
Submitted on 15th May
Reviewers invited on 25th May
Reviewers accepted on 25th May
Reviewers provided feedback on 25th May
Accepted on 3rd June

(1) Thank | Ma_duidui

Peer review
First reviewer(s) invited on June 4, 2025
Reviewer(s) accepted on June 4, 2025.

(0) Thank | pyh

The assistant in the editing office was reminded by email on 5.31 and replied that they would notify the editor. It has been over a month since then, and as of 6.3, there has been no communication with the editor.

(0) Thank | pyh

Could you please check your private messages? I have some questions to ask. Thank you.

(0) Thank | 混子叔叔

In the beginning, the system invited new reviewers, but it seems that no one responded. Finally, the senior editor accepted the invitation.

(0) Thank | fs-student

Did you have to wait for 5 months after the revision...I am also facing a similar situation now, where one of the reviewers disappeared after the revision...Did you eventually accept it? Were new reviewers invited later? Or did the original reviewer handle it?

(0) Thank | 混子叔叔

Your situation is that the reviewers have not yet agreed to review the manuscript. I feel this journal is very slow. It took more than a month for my submission to find a reviewer, and then I had to wait several months for feedback. After revising and resubmitting, one of the reviewers disappeared, and then it took another 5 months. In total, it took more than 10 months.

(0) Thank | fs-student

Did you send an email to the editor between the first invitation and the second invitation?

(0) Thank | 张心仪

Am I the only one who hasn't received feedback on my manuscript? What should I do? It's been over a month now, should I reach out to the editor for an update?

(0) Thank | 张心仪

The state of the screenshot is like this.

(0) Thank | 张心仪

Friends, I would like to ask about a status that has been showing "Under review by peers" since April 16th. Over 10 reviewers have been invited, but the history only shows "First reviewer(s) invited". Does this mean that no reviewers have accepted? Should I ask the editor about this?

(0) Thank | 张心仪

Hello, how long does it usually take to receive the copyright email after accep, and also the proof?

(0) Thank | fs-student

Can the elder brother accept only one major repair at a time? How many reviewers are there in the two rounds of review?

(0) Thank | 混子叔叔

The speed is very fast, and the revised version was accepted in just over three months. The overall progress is as shown in the diagram.

(0) Thank | lanjingdang

Do you know how long it takes for this journal to send out copyright and proofs after acceptance? The supervisor is holding the communication email, not taking care of anything, really worrying.

(0) Thank | fs-student

It has been 28 days since EA, and despite sending a reminder email, it is still in EA.

(0) Thank | dayaooo

May I ask how things are going now? I have been in this state for five weeks already.

(0) Thank | Mayy

When did you all invest? I have been waiting for 47 days.

(0) Thank | cheeenc

My EA took 23 days.

(0) Thank | pyh

Just submitted, make a note of it.

(0) Thank | zzz11gd