I submitted an image processing-related article. The editor-in-chief was especially good. The author was changed during the period. Every time the editor replied to emails very quickly. In particular, the reviewers I fortunately met were also very helpful, who also gave the correct expressions. The process is as follows: 2019.05.03, submitted; 2019.07.11, with editor; 2019.08.02, revised and resubmitted; 2019.09.24, under review; 2020.01.11, major revision; 2020.03.06, with editor; 2020.03.15, under review; 2020.05.11, minor revision; 2020.05.26, with editor; 2020.06.05, under review; 2020.08.19, with editor; 2020.08.27, accept. It can be searched on the Web of Science in late September 2020. There was no review fee in the whole process.

(5) Thank | 天山雪豹

You can choose non-OA.

(0) Thank | 长风呀

Okay, thank you.

(0) Thank | 长风呀

Submitted on February 7, 2025, accepted on June 27, 2025. Currently waiting for 3 weeks in the production phase, not sure when it will be published. Does anyone know when it will be published? Where can I go to see the publication? Just asking.

(0) Thank | 长风呀

It has been over a month since being hired, but there is still no news about when the publication will be released.

(0) Thank | 长风呀

Have any of the comrades who were hired in recent months already published their work? I recently checked the official website and found that the publication speed is extremely slow, with only a few articles published in a month. I'm not sure what's going on. It's been almost 2 months since my work was accepted for publication, but it still hasn't been published. Any older brothers with similar experiences?

(1) Thank | 混子叔叔

Direct barrier.

(0) Thank | Augenst3rn

After making minor revisions (approximately 20 suggestions), the article was accepted for publication.

(0) Thank | hsuan14

It's been over a month and I still haven't received WE, what's going on with this publication.

(0) Thank | Augenst3rn

Why is it taking so long? It has been over a month since I assigned the editor.

(0) Thank | Augenst3rn

I completed the verification on June 16th, but still cannot retrieve it now. What is the situation?

(0) Thank | yzk

How do we know if it's a major revision? The official website doesn't specify whether it's a major or minor revision. I invited two reviewers for this article and received a total of 20 comments. One of them suggested minor revisions, but provided 15 comments.

(0) Thank | hsuan14

Caution!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Submitted to the editor for review, it took two and a half months, and then the reviewers were not even contacted, the manuscript was directly rejected, and the reasons for rejection were completely unconvincing. Caution! Caution! Caution!

(0) Thank | Ekko

Invited more than ten reviewers, 7 accepted, and 4 have returned their opinions. Why hasn't the editor made a decision yet? Do we need to wait for all 7 opinions to come back?

(0) Thank | 芜湖起飞11111

A little pressure doesn't work at all, they're just trying to deceive me. It's been a month and we still haven't. I give up.

(0) Thank | ukiyo

The entire process took one year and one month. I will never forget this journal in my lifetime. My brother, I wish you good luck, but also be mentally prepared for the worst. It's best to quickly write and submit a few more articles to other journals, strive to meet the graduation requirements first, and then prepare to find a job as soon as possible.

(0) Thank | jjacktom

Brother, I guess you must have suffered like me. This journal has been torturing me. The first round of revisions passed the technical review in two days, then it sat in the editor's office for a month. By the time it came back, the reviewers probably forgot their comments. They were too lazy to review it again and ran away. Then new reviewers were invited, and all three agreed to review it. I made the changes and sent it back. The third round of revisions came back just three days after my thesis defense. At that time, I didn't even think about getting this article accepted. I had already met the graduation requirements and was ready to graduate. If it wasn't for Professor Bi pushing me to continue editing, I would have given up long ago. I finished the revisions in one day, even though they were rushed. I didn't care if it got accepted. It was accepted a week later, and a few days after that, I left the school. Just sharing my experience with this journal, it was quite a journey.

(0) Thank | jjacktom

The only word that can describe this journal is "historical". I should be the slowest one, it took me a year and a month to accept it just a few days before graduation. Luckily I wrote three articles, the third one was not submitted to my junior in time. The second one was selected for Zone 2, this fourth zone historical journal was the first one I completed. I almost delayed my graduation by trying this journal for the first time. Fortunately, the article in Zone 2 was selected in just two and a half months, I graduated and found a job, and now I wish everyone can be successful in their submissions and not encounter this kind of historical journal.

(0) Thank | jjacktom

This journal is super slow. It took me six and a half months to receive the first round of revisions for my first article, and after I made the revisions, it has been sitting in the editor's hands for a full three weeks with no response. Avoid this damn journal, it's really slow. My second article was rejected, with the reason being that they have too many articles to handle. It's just too slow, too slow. They accepted my second rejected article, I am truly amazed.

(2) Thank | cllsys

I submitted the third revision on June 2nd, and it is still under review by the editorial board. This journal is slower than the first-tier journals.

(0) Thank | lycutter

At the beginning of June, EA is still EA. I give up. Will it ever get better?

(0) Thank | ukiyo

It takes about 40 days for the submission to go through peer review, and the editor invites more than 10 reviewers. Is this normal?

(0) Thank | zzz11gd

Unable to retrieve, not sure what the problem is.

(0) Thank | Ma_duidui

Be cautious when submitting articles while waiting for graduation. The first article took six and a half months for the first round of revisions, which required adding some strange experiments. The second article was rejected due to too many submissions, causing delays. Progress is like opening a blind box, as some people were accepted after three or four months. It may be that the journal's fast processing speed and easy submission process attracted too many submissions, making it difficult to submit now. It may be worth looking for other journals to submit to.

(1) Thank | cllsys

May I ask if you are able to retrieve it now? I noticed that there have been no new articles posted on the official website of this journal in the past 11 days, which is unusual compared to previous months.

(0) Thank | gggggg123