Submitted for more than two months, it has not been Under review. The journal’s processing efficiency is too slow, the editor seems not to be responsible, and there is no response to any inquiry.

(7) Thank | kenfsf

Molecular Breeding is a classic journal of breeding, which is quite satisfactory. Although the impact factor is not high, the quality of many articles is not worse than that of TAG. In the past few years, the articles of fine mapping of wheat have basically been published on TAG, and the fine positioning articles of MOLB have been in fine quality in recent years. The review speed is slow. I got the review comments two months after submitting the manuscript. From submission to acceptance, it took 8 months in total. It was basically a month and a half before I got the review comments for each time. The reviewer's level is not bad. They gave us a lot of pertinent opinions, and the quality of the revised version has been improved a lot.

(14) Thank | 快乐的小疯子

Some articles have multiple submissions. For example, if you see an article in a flora, it will be in other journals. I feel that this journal review is still not rigorous. One author can publish in one journal and then republish here from just a different angle – but the data is the same. I feel a little disappointed.

(1) Thank | ggiy

This journal has now degraded into a second-rate journal. The main reason is that some domestic experts have replaced the previous editors, and the standards have declined sharply, resulting in many poor-quality articles. It used to have a relatively good international reputation, which is a pity.

(0) Thank | BOB202

The editor is not very responsible. The submission system cannot modify the author's information. He asked me to contact other authors myself to modify the information. Everyone has to register in the system first and then add the authors. The prerequisite is that all author information must be modified correctly and the format must meet the requirements.

(26) Thank | 若曦

This article has been watching the articles in MB for a while, and found that some articles have multiple submissions. For example, the article data of a flora is seen in other journals.Appeared, I feel that this journal review is still not rigorous, the same published paper data, the author describes it through another angle, and then can publish, feel a bit disappointed

(2) Thank | ggiy

MB Too many Chinese people are irrigating, feeling that sooner or later they will be kicked out sci

(1) Thank | dfhaou

The journal level is nb in our industry. The review period is long and will generally be tested.I made up the experiment, but I received it, and I was online right away. The first article was quite satisfactory.Ha

(0) Thank | 妞妞

The journal level is nb in our industry. The review period is long and will generally be tested.I made up the experiment, but I received it, and I was online right away. The first article was quite satisfactory.Ha

(0) Thank | 妞妞

MB is the industry's NB journal. Although the recent factor declines, it should rise soon. Compared with the PLOS one's irrigation article, the articles published on MB are almost the top level in the field.Support MB

(1) Thank | aniu

There will be preliminary results within 4 weeks of the general submission, but there are exceptions.The previous two articles were successfully accepted after the revision. After the last one submission, there was no information for more than three months. After the inquiry, more than one week after the inquiry, the letter was rejected.Some reviewers are more responsible, some are very nonsense, and have the feeling of deliberately drafting and martyrdom.

(0) Thank | www