The review period is less than one and a half months. After the overhaul, I submitted the article again. It took one month to receive notice of acceptance. There is no page fee, and authors with insufficient funds can consider it because the fees are charged to readers. The impact factor is declining year by year. In 2011, the IF is estimated to fall below 2.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted on August 14th, received for major overhaul on September 8th, given two months of time, returned on October 24th, and accepted directly on October 25th!

(0) Thank | Lucky 1

From submission to return for revision, it hasn't even been a month! And now it's under review again, I don't know what the outcome will be!

(0) Thank | 纵横

Hello, can I ask for a specific timeline? How long does the review process take? Thank you

(0) Thank | 凯利布鲁克

May I ask how long the review process for this journal usually takes?

(0) Thank | 四风雨华

Low-level journals have relatively low efficiency and are a bit slow. They can be used for submissions by novices (ordinary students) to experience the process of submitting to SCI journals

(0) Thank | 筑阳平筠

Key words for SCI papers are usually between 3 to 8

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, with the headings ":" and ":"

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How many minimum keywords are required?

(0) Thank | Oswald Edie

How many keywords are usually required by general journals?

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

May I ask what status your article is in now?

(0) Thank | Henry Jordan

So slow, it's been 5 days since I submitted it

(0) Thank | 西风建修

Can Plant Transcriptome Articles be Submitted?

Todbio 2017-07-09 23:30:00 Post: Submitted on January 16 this year, quickly sent to reviewers for review, received reviewers' comments on February 12, two reviewers provided more than 10 comments, with the second reviewer being very professional, quickly revised, but the reviewer was not satisfied, directly requested major revisions on March 22, okay, seriously supplemented experiments, took nearly 3 months in total, revised on June 17, accepted on July 6. Experience: Although this journal is a monthly publication, only about 6 articles are published each month, and there are fewer articles from Chinese authors, so there are no signs of flooding, reviewers are professional and responsible, as long as you respond well to reviewers' questions, do not neglect like I did the first time, and the content is also relatively good. The key is that it's free to publish, it's free, it's free, important things should be said three times, and after acceptance on July 6, the proof was sent on July 8, it was lightning fast, faster than any other journal I have submitted to

(0) Thank | 平原康健

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission success rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: I submitted my paper on January 16th this year, and it was quickly sent to the reviewers. On February 12th, I received the reviewers' comments. There were over 10 comments from two reviewers, with the second reviewer being very professional. I quickly made revisions, but the reviewer was not satisfied, so on March 22nd, I was asked to do major revisions. I diligently conducted experiments and spent nearly 3 months back and forth. I resubmitted on June 17th and it was accepted on July 6th. Experience: Although this journal is a monthly publication, it only publishes around 6 articles per month, with few submissions from Chinese authors. The reviewers are professional and diligent. As long as you answer the reviewers' questions seriously, unlike my first time where I didn't take it seriously enough, and as long as the content is good, your paper has a good chance of being accepted. The best part is that it's free to publish, free, free, free - important things are said three times. Also, after acceptance on July 6th, the proof was sent on July 8th - incredibly fast, faster than any other journal I've experienced before

(0) Thank | 稻妻若兰

Review speed: 2.0 Experience sharing: This journal does not charge page fees, which is good, and also the reason for submitting here. The speed is moderate, taking a total of 7 months from submission to acceptance, including 3 months of major revisions in my own hands and a week of minor revisions

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Do not invest in this trash magazine!!!!!!!!

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

IF it goes up again!!!!!! Optimistic---------

(0) Thank | 霹雳思聪

That's ridiculous, they rejected it without sending it to the reviewers, asked me to submit to SpringerPlus, such garbage

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Review Speed: 6.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 75.0
Experience Sharing: I submitted to a journal that I personally considered to be very poor. After waiting five months for the review process with no results, I decided to withdraw my submission

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.springer.com/chemistry/biotechnology/journal/12033

(0) Thank | Anonymous

No layout fee

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁