The priority is to choose the authors of the references in your submitted paper; avoid potential conflicts of interest

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The corresponding author is the principal investigator of the project, responsible for the funding, design, writing of the articles, and quality control of the project. They are responsible for communication with the journal during submission, peer review, and the entire publication process

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is a corresponding author?

(0) Thank | 龙鳞孝礼

What should be paid attention to when recommending peer review?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

Showing an upward trend, optimistic about the future, what do you all think?

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: The review process took one and a half months, with three reviewers providing feedback - two minor revisions and one major revision suggested. The editor also suggested a major revision, which required an additional four months to conduct the necessary experiments. The reviewers were all very professional. It's not easy to submit to this well-established parasitology journal

(0) Thank | 中原平凡

Reviewed for a month and a half, although the score is not high, the editor is very responsible and serious, a well-established journal in the field of parasitology!

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

The review process is very slow, it took over five months for the first review to be completed, and only after a reminder did I receive a response

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

The review process is a bit slow

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁