2020.9.9, submitted; 2020.9.10, with editor; 2020.9.22, under review; 2020.9.28, required review completed; 2020.9.28, revised; 2020.10.19, submitted; 2020.10.20, under review; 2020.10.21, required review completed; 2020.10.21, revised; 2020.10.23, submitted; 2020.10.24, with editor; 2020.10.26, accepted. There were 2 reviewers, and there were 9 minor questions raised in total. One reviewer only raised one question (supplementing a characterization), and both of the reviewers were suggested publication after revision. In general, the speed was very fast. This may be related to editors and reviewers. Thanks to the Brazilian editor! After being rejected twice by the Chinese journals (not sent for review), I decided to submit this article to an English journal.

(2) Thank | wby1110

2020-02-21 Confirmation of Submission to 3M. Editor, Pascal DC Dietzel. 2020-06-08 Reviewers have now commented on your paper. 2020-06-18 MICMAT-D-20-00XXXR1 (the editor pointed out that there was something wrong with our naming method); 2020-06-19 MICMAT-D-20-00XXXR2 (we pointed out that that's what it was named in the industry); 2020-06-22 MICMAT-D-20-00XXXR3 (The editor gave an ultimatum, thinking that the naming should not follow the trend); 2020-06-24 MICMAT-D-20-00XXXR4 (Don’t tangle when you should show your personality. Thank the editor for no rejection); 2020-07-04 The article is now available online. 3M has been upgraded to Q1, and the future development trend is unlimited. Investment requires a long-term perspective, not just looking at the present.

(6) Thank | Ben

It was submitted on February 27 2020, after that, the statuses were under review and required reviews completed (it should be changed once after the review of each reviewer ended). Major revision was required on April 29 2020. (Four reviewers, one accepted it directly; one required me to revise the abstract greatly and said that the background of my mapping diagram was too strong and needed to be retested; one required me to supplement data processing diagram and cite two references, and then it would be accepted; one asked me about the phenomenon of results of the experiment, which was not easy to answer. In addition, I was required to supplement the picture of the reviewer with the same question and add more controlled trials. After that, it would be accepted.) I couldn’t do the experiments during the pandemic, so I retested the mapping using the previous samples and supplemented the data processing diagrams. The others were responded in words with a sincere attitude. The answer is self-confident and reasonable. The reviewers were nice, and the comments raised were very professional. The editor was also nice! 2020.5.20, revision submitted; 2020.6.3, accept.

(4) Thank | Tjiang

The submission process can take too long, even over 6 months. But the reviewer’s evaluations are good.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Seven reviewers agreed to review, and four opinions have already been received, but the editor has not handled them yet, and it is still under review and revision by the reviewers. Does this journal require waiting for all reviewers' opinions before processing?

(0) Thank | zoe11

May I ask what your current status is?

(0) Thank | NEU-HMY

I don't know if it's normal for the editor-in-chief to make a decision in just two days after submission, or if it means they are going to reject the submission directly.

(0) Thank | @会飞的鱼

Received 17 October 2024, Revised 19 December 2024, Accepted 27 December 2024, Available online 28 December 2024.

(0) Thank | GORY

Are you ready to submit to the special issue of materials (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/materials/special_issues/46265p7124) on clay and molecular sieves that fall within the scope of the materials journal? You can start by sending me the author information and abstract (earthwandering[at]outlook.com), and I will apply for a discount with the editorial office.

(0) Thank | imagination

Which editor are you referring to?

(0) Thank | 倾凉音

The submission experience was very smooth, although it took a month to make modifications, the process was still quite fast. Although the reviewers' suggestions were a bit numerous, they were very helpful in improving the quality of the paper.

9.12 submitted to journal
9.13 with editor
9.16 with editor
9.18 under review
9.28 Required reviews completed (2/7)
9.29 under review (2 additional reviewers added)
10.8 revise (major revision)
11.6 Revision submitted to journal
11.7 with editor
11.12 under review
11.12 minor revisions
11.13 resubmission
11.13 Accepted

(0) Thank | ncuxu

Received 21 May 2024,
Revised 24 June 2024,
Accepted 3 July 2024,
Available online 5 July 2024,
Version of Record 8 July 2024.

(0) Thank | 倾凉音

2024.02.08 Submit
2024.02.10 Under review
2024.03.05 Revise
2024.03.08 Revision Submitted
2024.03.09 Under Review
2024.03.22 Accept

(2) Thank | FanFan_DLUT

I don't understand why it has been reduced to Q3. A well-known journal on molecular sieves has been relegated to Q3. Shall we submit to Water Journal instead?

(129) Thank | Jueyan

2023.8.19 submitted to journal
2023.9.24 major
2023.10.23 submitted to journal
2022.11.25 required reviews completed
2022.11.27 accept

(0) Thank | 泰兴小石头

Hello, how many reviewers provided feedback on the article at that time?

(0) Thank | 认真搞科研的小幸运同学

How many reviewers' comments did you receive for your article?

(0) Thank | 认真搞科研的小幸运同学

The article has been accepted, thanks to Dr. Wu Peng for editing

(0) Thank | 菜直

I would like to ask, how long does it usually take for the hiring process to be completed?

(0) Thank | SCI*

Please translate the following passage into English and Japanese, with the headings "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

(0) Thank | 菜直

Under review as of 8.11

(0) Thank | 菜直

The editing process is a bit slow. It has been a week and it is still being edited

(0) Thank | 菜直

Why is it still "with editor" even though it's already the 9th?

(0) Thank | 菜直

8.4 avec l'éditeur translates to "8.4 with the editor" in English.

(0) Thank | 菜直

Take note, 8.3 submitted to journal.

(0) Thank | 菜直