9.20 submitting to journal; 9.21 with editor; 9.22 under review until today... There is no news yet. It is a bit slow.

(20) Thank | 小小明

The review period is very fast, and the requirement for innovation is relatively high. It is relatively suitable for content that is novel and needs to be published first.

(0) Thank | Paul船长

The editors are fast, especially with revisions. But the reviewers are strict.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted on January 23, 2025
Under review on January 24, 2025
Decision in process on March 25, 2025
Hoping for a positive outcome.

(0) Thank | LLen

Will continue to pay attention, hope to find reviewers soon.

(0) Thank | LLen

2025-01-23 submitted
2025-01-24 under review
2025-02-24 Reviewer not found, reminder sent
Today is February 25, 2025, one month of review.

(0) Thank | LLen

Today is October 31st, a full 20 days. The review process has been about 3 weeks, and I am looking forward to a positive outcome.

(0) Thank | robot

After one month of reviewing and major revisions, followed by a minor revision, the manuscript was accepted for publication the next day after the minor revision was submitted.

(0) Thank | ABCDEDDFVS

There will definitely be news after two months of review. The editor is relatively good. 

Review process:
First review, one rejection and one revision request, the editor requested major revisions.
Second review, one rejection and one acceptance, the editor rejected it.

The reasons for the two rejections are not clear. The reviewers who were rejected thought it was due to data errors (which were not explicitly mentioned in the first review, so the revisions were not made in a timely manner). 
In fact, it was a misunderstanding and not a data error, but rather an overlap in the peak spectrum (I would like to explain). I don't really like the vague rejection style of the reviewers, it seems they just don't like this short article. 
In the end, the editor rejected it and there was no chance to explain. 
I submitted two articles before and had similar issues (one rejection and one acceptance). The reviewers who rejected it seemed to have a higher level of subjectivity. 
It's a very good journal! I will submit again if I have good data.

(1) Thank | 朱

9.20 submitting to journal
9.21 with editor
9.22 under review
、、、During the waiting process, send an email to inquire on 1.22
1.23 minor revise
1.25 resubmitted to journal
1.25 accepted

(0) Thank | 小小明

How are yours? Mine still has no movement.

(0) Thank | 小小明

2020.08.20投
It has been 5 months and still no news.
Is it because of the new coronavirus or something??

(0) Thank | shawangrenjian

Review speed is fast, give advice for ten days.The reviewer's question is very professional, and the day after the overhaul is returned,

(0) Thank | ironman

3 Reviewers, raised more than 30 questions.Most of the opinions are very professional.After the revision, the editor received it on the same day.

(1) Thank | IMR

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) Thank | Anonymous

may be a bimonthly, the speed is generally the same.

(0) Thank | Anonymous