Received at Editorial Office 16 Mar 2020; Major revision 5 May 2020; Article revised 1 Jul 2020; Article accepted for publication 25 Jul 2020. It took approximately six weeks from submission to the first review, a major revision was required, and the reviewer's comments are very good. It took us nearly two months to complete the revision, and about three weeks for the second review, then it was directly accepted.

(1) Thank | 西瓜呀

The editors are good and the reviewer’s comments are pertinent. But the review can be slow. It’s best to expect over 4-6 months for the process.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

The speed is good, and the opinions are professional.
Submitted on August 14, 2024
Major revisions on October 20, 2024
Minor revisions on December 25, 2024
Accepted on January 5, 2025
Online publication on January 9, 2025

(0) Thank | 半瓶水

Very quickly and professionally, three reviewers provided dozens of comments, resulting in a response of over 20 pages.
Submitted on November 4th
Major revise on December 1st
Revised manuscript returned on December 31st
Accepted on January 2nd

(0) Thank | ZhangDDong

A very good journal.

(0) Thank | shengchengxia

Great journal, the second paper has been accepted after revision!

(0) Thank | SCI追求者

February 15th Submitted
March 11th Major Revise
April 5th Revised Manuscript Submitted
April 8th Accept
Two reviewers provided several comments and questions, which were all addressed and supplemented with experimental data in a 14-page Response. Overall, the reviewers were very professional, the editor was very responsible, and the processing speed was fast. I will consider submitting to this journal again in the future

(1) Thank | 三维矩阵空间

Hello, how fast is the review process? Is submitting a paper in three parts, including a cover letter, Manuscript File, and Declaration of Interest Statement? Do I need to submit code and programs?

(0) Thank | L11_11

Hello, does this journal have a submission template?

(0) Thank | lylyly123

First time submitting, the editing process was thorough and efficient, and the reviewer's feedback was very constructive. Overall, I had a great experience with this journal!

(1) Thank | SCI追求者

The review process is quick and the feedback is also very professional, highly recommended!

(0) Thank | 北冥有鱼

Hello. Is the "R" in your "Under Review" capitalized? I heard there is a difference even in "Under Review"

(0) Thank | SCI追求者

I progress every 20 days, the efficiency of this journal is still very high

(0) Thank | 小马哥

1.15 submit - Please submit.
1.16 under review - Currently being reviewed.

(0) Thank | 小马哥

A journal with a good level in the field of microelectronics. The reviewers are very professional and raised over thirty questions in total. I supplemented the experiments for a month, which significantly improved the quality of the article. After two rounds of revisions, it was accepted for publication. The journal has a high quality and both its ranking and impact factor are expected to further improve.

(8) Thank | wwwhd

Editing is very powerful ah

(1) Thank | Anonymous

好杂志

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Review time is fixed,Two selects were sent in 3-4 months.The reviewers are very serious and the questions are very detailed.However, I feel that it is still a good journal.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://ees.elsevier.com/mej/

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Persistence is victory, 5 judges, tastes will not be exactly the same,Grasping the commonality and seriously responding to the comments of the judges, the editorial quality of the journal is very high, and people feel very good.

(0) Thank | Anonymous