It is a very good journal, and the number of articles accepted is not large. If a few more reviews are accepted, the impact factor will rise a lot.

(0) Thank | wang ling

This is the top journal in the field of microbial ecology. The impact factor has been 3.5; some papers are equivalent to EM. There are 3 reviewers. The opinions are sharp. I have submitted for the editors’ decision.

(0) Thank | 微生物代谢

Translation: Regarding that bio with unknown nationality: Yes, aren't you yourself not Chinese? Answer me, is it because you are not Chinese, that's why you like 3-4 point articles, or is it that you can only post 3-4 point articles?

(0) Thank | hhtyllbry

Great reputation! The reviewers are very responsible, and the editors have strong editing skills!

(0) Thank | Endophyte-boy

Is this magazine highly recognized abroad? Why is it only moderately well-known in the country?

(0) Thank | cocoball

Chinese people do not like low IF but difficult to medium IF. Chinese people like high IF and good to medium IF, such as science of the total environment

(0) Thank | Bio平平

Submitted on August 10th, received minor revisions from the editor on December 10th, resubmitted for revisions on December 23rd, and accepted on December 27th. The opinions given by the three reviewers were detailed and professional, but the process was too slow. Additionally, the reviewers were chosen by the editor, so we did not need to provide them

(0) Thank | 裴P_P裴

Classic old journals, not being watered by the Chinese

(0) Thank | cocoball

Heavy research focus: Microbiology; Sharing of microbial ecology experiences: The reviewer procrastinated until the last day to provide review comments. Based on the questions he raised, it is apparent that he did not read the paper properly. No constructive feedback was given. I will not submit to this journal again. Wasted time

(0) Thank | 华清紫柔

Main research direction: Microbiology; Sharing of microbial ecology experiences: Excuse me, which zone is this? Should we refer to the basic version or the upgraded version of the CAS?

(0) Thank | 华清紫柔

The review process was fast, submitted on June 8th, and accepted on October 24th. Three reviewers provided dozens of professional comments during the first round of revision. It took two months for the revisions to be made and the paper was accepted after being resubmitted. The journal has a very low publication volume and lacks influence, but the overall quality of the articles is good and the review speed is fast. It is highly suitable for submitting papers in the field of environmental microbiology.

(57) Thank | 凡人修仙

Statistical significance is generally determined by the P value obtained through hypothesis testing

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Choose a post hoc test method based on the data results obtained

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and give the translations under the headings ":" and "

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

What kind of post-examination method should I use?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

Very good magazine, the review process is fast. Submitted in March, accepted in June. 4 reviewers, went through two rounds of evaluation.

(5) Thank | 哈哈哈哈哈哈哈

A very good magazine, but with very few articles

(0) Thank | 万花海凡

This journal is very good. How is the comment so little?Chinese people do not select?

(0) Thank | ust

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: This magazine is very good. Why are there so few reviews? Are Chinese not submitting?

(0) Thank | 极乐寻山

Top journal in the field of microbial ecology, with very low publication volume, impact factor has exceeded 3.5, some papers are on par with EM, with 3 reviewers, extremely rigorous peer review, sharp opinions, responded with 15 pages, submitted awaiting editorial decision

(0) Thank | Ursula Watt

The reviewer was very professional and provided good suggestions on the structure of the article. There should be some highlights

(0) Thank | 魔都芸欣

Reviewers are very professional and give good advice on the structure of the article.To have a bright spot

(0) Thank | x

Which zone is this magazine from the Chinese Academy of Sciences? There are no rewards in our Zone 3, only in Zone 2 and Zone 1

(0) Thank | 缠丝慕丹

Review Speed: 3.0
Experience Sharing: Personally, I feel that it's been harder to get published in the past two years compared to the previous years, even though the quality of the articles is good

(0) Thank | Wendy Joel

The quality of the article is very good. One editor mentioned that the rejection rate is 85%, especially for domestic submissions

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁