Aug 12, 2020 Submitted to Journal; Aug 16, 2020 With Editor; Aug 26, 2020 Under Review; Sep 08, 2020 Required Reviews Completed; Sep 11, 2020 Revise Major Revision; Oct 13, 2020 Revision Submitted to Journal; Oct 17, 2020 Under Review; Nov 03, 2020 Required Reviews Completed; Nov 04, 2020 Revise Accept with minor revision; Nov 08, 2020 Revision Submitted to Journal; Nov 12, 2020 Accept. The review speed was very fast. The review comments were received within almost a month, including the editor’s processing time, which didn’t waste any time. Three reviewers have 20 comments, and they are all professional.

(5) Thank | 好好学习天天向上

Three reviewers for the first review, two required major revisions, and one accepted it directly. The two experts who required the major revision all hinted that I should cite their articles, but I refused because they were not relevant to the content of my article. After the revision, the first reviewer said that I did not make good changes and it was not suitable for publication. The second one accepted it. The editor found another two external review experts. Both external review experts felt that the article was very innovative, and asked a few small questions. The editor decided to accept it after minor revisions, and then it was accepted directly after revision. 2020-5-13 Submitted to Journal; 2020-5-17 Under Review; 2020-5-29 Required reviews complete; 2020-6-04 Major Revision; 2020-6-11 Under Review; 2020-6-16 Required Reviews Completed; 2020-6-16 Under Review; 2020-7- 25 Required Reviews Completed; 2020-7-27 Accepted with minor revision; 2020-7-28 Revision Submitted to Journal; 2020-8-1 Accept.

(3) Thank | chxifei

Feb 13 2020, submitted; Feb 13, with editor; Feb 19, under review; Apr 6, required reviews completed; Apr 24, revision required; May 12, resubmitted; May 17, with editor; Jun 1, accepted with minor revision; Jun 4, resubmitted; Jun 7, accepted for publication. It was my first time to submit to SCI, and it was just in time for the pandemic. During the period, there was no news for a long time after review. After writing a letter to the editorial department and urged it, the revision comments of the reviewers were received in the next week. The comments of the reviewers were relatively profound. After half a month of careful revision, the revised manuscript was resubmitted. After that, it went smoothly, and it was accepted in less than a month.

(15) Thank | 王重阳

After our paper underwent minor repairs, the submission process ended up being smooth.  The editing process is fast, and the reviewer reviews the manuscript for about 1 month. There were three reviewers. Well-known journal in the measurement field!

(5) Thank | SCI交流

This is a large amount of manuscripts, selecting the most suitable and eye-catching ones from dozens or hundreds in hand. The rest will be determined based on the volume of manuscripts, with some being sent for review after a long wait if lucky, or advised to submit elsewhere if unlucky. A decision will be made in about 30 days.

(0) Thank | Yuan yuan

I submitted it at the end of March, and the editor held onto it for a month. When it reached exactly 31 days, they suggested that I resubmit it.

(0) Thank | Yuan yuan

After the second major revision, it has been in the "with editor" status. May I ask how long will the editor take to process and send it for review?

(0) Thank | kkizr等待中

You review so fast.

(0) Thank | 学术小白花

2025-4-26 Submitted to Journal
2025-4-28 Under Review 0 0 4

(0) Thank | Tcyaa

Reviewers also have a tough job, as it is all voluntary work. Everyone is very busy, so not every reviewer can complete their review on time. It is likely that the editors are urging the reviewers to complete their reviews.

(0) Thank | 顺其自然叶

I guess they are still looking for reviewers.

(0) Thank | 顺其自然叶

I submitted it much earlier than you, but it hasn't been reviewed yet.

(0) Thank | Accept

RRC has never urged.

(0) Thank | Hally D

Please send directly within the submission system.

(0) Thank | syg01

Please send an email to the editorial department inquiring about the status and requesting them to expedite the manuscript.

(0) Thank | kkizr等待中

Could you please ask everyone, under review on March 4th, invited 7 reviewers, now on April 28th, none of them have accepted the review. There are no editorial emails in the system or in the emails. Is there any way to urge the submission in this situation? Could you please let me know, everyone?

(0) Thank | 清风明月照我心

This journal is particularly slow, I don't know why. I submitted it on April 10th, but it's still in the hands of the editor on April 28th. They haven't decided whether to review or reject it. Do any experts know what's going on?

(0) Thank | Accept小狗！

Did you follow up on the manuscript submission at that time, or did the editor take the initiative to handle it afterwards?

(0) Thank | 幺幺零

Most likely they have run away.

(0) Thank | 7h

Underwent one major revision and two minor revisions; the manuscript was accepted for publication without being returned to the reviewers after the second minor revision.

The editing process was relatively fast, but it was difficult to find reviewers and they reviewed the manuscript at a slow pace, resulting in an overall slow progress.

(1) Thank | guo

Submission to initial review results in 3.5 months;
Submission to acceptance in 6 months;
The detailed timeline for initial review is as follows:
10.21 Submitted to Journal
2024.10.22 with editor
2024.10.24 with editor
2024.10.24 under review
2024.10.25 0 1 4
2024.11.16 0 1 7
2024.11.26 0 2 9
2024.12.19 0 3 12
2024.12.31 1 3 12
2025.1.7 1 4 14
2025.1.9 2 4 14
2025.1.16 3 4 14
2025.1.16 required reviews complete
2025.1.17 under review
2025.1.17 3 4 16
2025.1.18 3 5 16
2025.2.9 RRC
2025.2.10 decision in process
2025.2.10 major

(1) Thank | guo

RRC is the editor who handled it, and I have also waited for over a week before. If the reviewers' opinions are not consistent, the editor will change the status of the paper back to UR, which means waiting for the opinions of other reviewers. If the opinions are relatively consistent, the paper will enter DIP, and you will receive a summarized feedback.

(0) Thank | Hally D

Could you please confirm if the system will remind reviewers if they exceed the review time? It shows that one reviewer has been reviewing for 27 days and has not yet provided the result. Has the reviewer possibly forgotten about it?

(0) Thank | 幺幺零

I am a reviewer for this journal, and the review time given to me is 21 days, which is quite fast.

(0) Thank | 顺其自然叶

On the 21st, we were rejected on the 26th. Yang Yong, the editor, said that the content we submitted did not align with the focus of this issue. Can anyone recommend a fast journal in the second or third district?

(0) Thank | 检测菜鸟