The top journal in our field that the big shots in our direction submit to didn't work for me, so I searched for other journals they submit to, and then I found this one! When I submitted to this journal, the review process generally took about a month or a little longer, with two reviewers. The reviewers were very humble and strict in their comments, and their suggestions were very constructive. In addition, the editor gave me many opportunities for revision. Because of my own level, it took several months from submission to acceptance. Although the impact factor of this journal seems not very high, they take manuscripts very seriously and strictly, and the reviewers they found were very appropriate! Thank you to this journal for helping me publish my first SCI paper! I hope these experiences can help those in need!

(0) Thank | uwhen06

The principle of writing methods is to provide enough experimental information for peers to repeat the experimental process. The indicators and procedures needed for the experiment should be described comprehensively and standardized

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Mainly describes the use of animals, cell culture methods; the main experimental operation methods; and the operation methods of techniques and instruments

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How detailed and specific should the methods be?

(0) Thank | 上清雨真

What is required in the general method?

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Submitted in January, went through several reviewers, finally under review by the end of February, hoping for a positive outcome

(0) Thank | 一吃就胖小赛赛

Unfortunately, my article received over 2 points last year, but it only got slightly over 1 point this year. Will it decrease even more next year? Who would want to invest in it!

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Too harsh! With such a big drop, who dares to invest in the future?

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁