The article was submitted on June 30, it was always under consideration; The result was returned on August 19, and minor revision was required. Two questions were asked, and ethics approval was requested to supplement; The revised article was submitted on September 11; It was accepted on September 29.

(0) Thank | 乔乔

It took over a year from submission to acceptance. The journal is very efficient, and the editor is very nice. Because the old journals in the field of biomaterials have been hit by some new journals in recent years, the impact factor has dropped a bit. But the reputation in the industry is still good!

(4) Thank | longshaoye

You don't have to, isn't it okay if you don't buy the cover service?

(0) Thank | 谈用药

10.07 minor revision

(0) Thank | 冰之随想

9.28 revise submitt

(0) Thank | 冰之随想

9.23 Major Revision

(0) Thank | 冰之随想

9.11 under review

(0) Thank | 冰之随想

9.9 with editor

(0) Thank | 冰之随想

8.28 submit

(0) Thank | 冰之随想

This ultimately requires a publication fee, right? Are we required to select a minimum of 50 copies and PDF files? Can we choose not to or just select one?

(0) Thank | 我爱平底锅27

Posted on October 28th
Major revision on November 16th, with two reviewers and around 25 questions. Need to supplement a few experiments, but no animal experiments involved.
Revised on December 20th, with a lot of characterizations. There are a total of 11 figures in the Supplementary Information (SI).
Accepted directly on January 11th without any modifications.
It is probably the highest journal that can be submitted without animal experiments. I have submitted to this journal twice before, and it took about 2 and a half months from submission to acceptance.

(3) Thank | 谈用药

October 12th submission
November 22nd major revision, two reviewers, 16 questions; sent back to the editorial department for revision after 16 days;
December 20th accepted directly, without any changes
December 23rd, the editorial department suggests attaching a table of contents (ToC)

(0) Thank | 我是涛哥哥

First submission on July 14th, followed by two reminders in between. The editor was very nice and patiently responded. Revised the article on September 17th, making minor changes to four issues. The reviewer was friendly and not sharp in their questions. Submitted again on October 5th. Made changes to images and other minor issues on October 23rd, and accepted on October 28th. This is my first SCI article. The process was long and waiting was painful, but luckily the outcome was good. I wish the magazine continued to thrive and be successful!

(1) Thank | 苦逼麻辣鸡丝

2021.6.7 Submission
2021.7.27 Received comments from the reviewers. The editor provided major revisions, but there was only one reviewer's comment and it was positive. They asked for citation of references and only posed questions without requesting additional experiments. The questions were relatively simple, and I was able to write a response within an hour.
2021.8.5 Uploaded the response to the comments.
2021.8.9 Accepted.
This is my first small article during my PhD period. Although the topic is not very exciting, I am already satisfied. It greatly encouraged my motivation to conduct experiments.
Wishing the journal continued success.

(2) Thank | Accept619

Hello, teacher. May I ask if you have received any news from the magazine company? I have also been waiting for almost half a month and haven't received any news. Thank you.

(0) Thank | 苦逼麻辣鸡丝

I have been waiting for a month, and it has been under consideration all this time. I'm in a hurry to graduate, but what should I do? I should have known not to submit to this journal.

(2) Thank | 东大泡芙小王子阿阿

How much is the layout fee?

(0) Thank | Dr. Chang

The following text has been translated into English: 

I submitted a review article on biomaterials. 
March 1, 2021, submitted for review. 
March 19, 2021, received revision comments. 
March 26, 2021, submitted response to comments. 
April 9, 2021, article accepted. 
The efficiency of the journal is good, and I hope it continues to improve!

(1) Thank | 发现新大陆

A very promising journal belonging to the Macromolecular category, which focuses on biology and is the third-ranked journal in Biomaterials journal (in front of Biomaterials and Acta biomaterialia), the impact factor should beWill gradually increase.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Reviewing is very fast.I will reply to the comments within half a month and ask for minor revisions according to the reviewers' opinions. It is estimated that I will receive them soon.The article impact factor is still good.Although it fell from 3.88 this year's 3.7.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Reviewing a very serious journal, returning comments about one month after submitting the manuscript, suggesting minor repairs, minor repairs returning after a few days to receive

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This magazine is very strict in its review process. After submitting, it takes about a month to receive feedback, usually suggesting minor revisions. Once the revisions are made, the paper is accepted within a few days

(0) Thank | 矢泽素玲

One month for review comments, two reviewers raised 8 questions (to submit revised manuscript within two weeks), and the manuscript was accepted the next day after all questions were answered! A total of 45 days from submission to acceptance!

(0) Thank | Cliff Cook

one month for review commentsThe two reviewers submitted 8 questions (submitted within two weeks) and received the answer the next day after the submission!From submission to receiving 45 days!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

impact factor of 3.458 (2010

(0) Thank | 凌霄友竹