The first two reviewers had conflicting opinions.
Another third reviewer was sought, who rejected the manuscript a week later.
The reason given was lack of innovation.
Review process was slow, and there was a hurry to graduate, so it was not advisable to submit it again.

(1) Thank | 流光y

Compressed wood, the review is super slow, more than twoMonth no results

(7) Thank | 一定要顺利接收

2017.8.9Submission, 2018.1.22 Recruitment

(0) Thank | 854222005@qq.com

editor responsible, and the review speed was relatively fast, and the experts made many suggestions.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

journal is very friendly, most of the Japanese industry researchers have papers, but do not exclude Chinese papers,The format requirements are very strict, and you should be careful not to have formatting errors before submitting.My paper has been reviewed for about 10 months, but the results are good.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

4.26Submission, 5.16 for external review, 7.21 for return of revision, one overhaul for minor repair;It took more than 20 days to complete the revision and return to the revised draft, 8.25 to return comments, a minor repair, and a reception;9.22 Return to the review conclusion and receive it.Patience is undoubtedly there is to be, but there are a few points I know about to share with you:(1) Try to improve your own articles before submitting the manuscript, and reduce the technical modifications in the process;(2) When everyone sees the overhaul opinion, don't worry, answer a little according to the reviewer's request, speak with facts, be confident and not gibberish, be humble and not inferior, and clearly explain the problem, the crux of the problem.If the idea of ​​the article is more innovative, even if the test results are not very good in agreement with the theoretical results and the simulation results, as long as the source of the error is explained, the difficulty is stated, the analysis is in place, and the subsequent research can be carried out on this basis.article.This is also a big difference between foreign journals and domestic journals.

(2) Thank | lpgzhang@163.com

Japanese people's efficiency is still very fast, submitted on May 7th, and returned to the first draft on June 16th. Both reviewers said Xiao Xiu,They are all symbols.So the next day, I finished the final return. After being pressed by the editor for a week, I was sent to the reviewer. I received the accept in a few days.Before I selectd for wood, I was rejected. The first sci finally had a result.

(6) Thank | Anonymous

is too slow, I am crazy, but the review is very serious, there is a Japanese style.My thesis has been changed once. Now that 5 months have passed, there is still no result. I hope I can be accepted and look forward to it!

(1) Thank | zjy_29445629@qq.com

Reviewing speed is very slow.The first trial was 4 months and the review was 1.5 months.It took almost 7 months from submitment to reception.However, the reviewers are still very responsible. I have read more than 30 questions, big and small, and I have learned a lot from his problems.Finally he was very satisfied with my answer.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

"Wood Society" Japan ISSN: 1435-0211, started in 1955, 6 issues throughout the year, Springer-Verlag Press.SCI included journals, SCI 2002 impact factor of 0.639.Paper on basic research and applications in the wood industry, newsletter from the Japan Wood Society.It involves the properties, organization, strength, storage, drying, processing and retorting of wood.

(0) Thank | Anonymous