Thank you for your experience. The editors are still very good. 6 months after submission, I was anxious and sent an email reminder, and then they quickly gave review comments and required major revisions. It was then accepted one month after the revision. The reviewers were relatively professional and gave valuable comments. The following is the process of the paper, for your reference only. 17-12-2019 Initial date submitted; 19-12-2019 With editor; 08-02-2020 Under Review; 26-05-2020 Major revision; 12-07-2020 Revised, with editor; 04-08-2020 Accepted.

(4) Thank | 老5

2019.7.25 Submit; 2019.08.25 Under Review. Two reminders. 2020.06.05 Minor revision. 2020.06.13 Submit revised manuscript. A reminder. 2020.07.14 Accept. It’s really too long, too long. You must remember to remind the manuscript. Reminding manuscripts is too important.

(2) Thank | POMEKWD

2019.12.28, submission; 2019.12.31, with editor; 2020.02.10, under review; 2020.04.18, major revision; 2020.05.06, submitted revised manuscript; 2020.06.19, accept. The editor was nice, who gave many good suggestions. The comments raised by the reviewers were pertinent, professional and constructive, and they should be the peer. During the period, it was Christmas and Chinese New Year; the whole process took a bit long time. In addition, it was affected by the COVID-19, it took half a year. I hope that domestic and foreign colleagues will be healthy and safe during pandemic!

(2) Thank | 逍遥和尚

This journal is very responsible, and will not deliberately ask for a major change in the language of the publication of the Aswell Publishing House. The overall feeling is that the editor is very good, and it is inconvenient to repeatedly modify the details until acceptance. I have already sent two articles and I feel that the editor is very good. As for the IF, it is only 1.75, which is not high. It will rise very quickly, but it is a journal with similar influence as TCA and IECR.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Why do you only have 1 reviewer? I had 4 reviewers, all experts in a niche field, and the feedback they provided was very professional. It took me 9 months of revisions, major and minor, before finally being accepted. I thought all journals were this strict with their peer review process.

(0) Thank | oama123

The review process took 9 months. It was probably because the subject matter was too niche and they couldn't find reviewers. After sending two reminder emails, they finally said that there was only one reviewer who recommended major revisions. After making the revisions and resubmitting, it took another month to be accepted. I thought it was going to be rejected, but I was relieved that it was accepted in the end.

(0) Thank | 璐

It has been almost a year since I submitted my manuscript. The status has been "Under Review" the whole time and has not changed. Can you please share the withdrawal email address with me?

(0) Thank | fighter∞

Hello, may I ask which email you used to withdraw the submission?

(0) Thank | fighter∞

Submission: 24-11-21
Under review: 25-03-02

(0) Thank | zzz

Received. The current review period for this journal is a bit long.

(0) Thank | oama123

Currently, from the submission experience, it can be seen that the journal is still very strict. In the first round of submissions, there were 4 reviewers: one suggested minor revisions, two suggested major revisions, and one rejected the submission. The editor-in-chief also rejected the submission but gave the opportunity to resubmit. After making revisions for about a month, the second submission was reviewed by 3 reviewers: one suggested acceptance, two suggested minor revisions, and the editor-in-chief suggested major revisions. After continuing to make major revisions for about half a month, the submission was accepted in the third round of submissions about 1 month later. The whole process lasted for more than 9 months, which was very lengthy.

(0) Thank | oama123

Keep calm, good things come to those who wait.

(0) Thank | 携李

There seems to be some issue within this journal, it looks like they might be closing down.

(0) Thank | pnq2008

So scary! Your hand reached out here?

(0) Thank | pnq2008

This journal is also top-notch.

(0) Thank | pnq2008

I tried contacting them, but there was no response. After seeing everyone's comments, I realized I have already fallen into a trap. It's too slow, it's been over a month and it still hasn't reached the editor! I'm prepared to follow up, but if there's still no response, I'll withdraw. I'm just afraid that even withdrawing won't elicit a response.

(0) Thank | pnq2008

2.8 First review feedback, major revision.
2.20 Reviewer's feedback returned.
2.21 Really hoping the editor will accept it, this paper has been in progress for almost a year, my mindset is already crumbling.

(0) Thank | oama123

Just wanted to ask what's going on.

(0) Thank | LR.C

Submitted in June, rejected by three major revisions, the editor gave a revision and resubmission, revised and submitted on November 2nd, today is November 25th, still with editor, so slow, too draggy.

(0) Thank | oama123

It's been exactly nine days short of a full eleven months, and the speed of this review process is truly incredible. I made one revision in the middle, and if it gets rejected, I swear I'll put a curse on this journal.

(0) Thank | Raymond

Hello, I would like to ask how to withdraw a submission from this journal. I couldn't find this option in the system.

(0) Thank | 朝朝暮山

How does the original poster withdraw the submission? There is no such option in the system.

(0) Thank | 朝朝暮山

Withdrawal of the manuscript without turning back, but suddenly withdrew.

(0) Thank | suesw2

Submission between May 5th and May 20th, still with editor as of July 4th, please consider carefully.

(0) Thank | R_hhh

What a rubbish journal, I give up, it's been 1 month and still with the editor, is the editor on vacation??

(0) Thank | oama123