2020.04.28 First submission; 2020.05.02 It was returned. The similarity score exceeded 20%, and it needed to be reduced; 2020.05.20 Second submission; 2020.06.18 Review opinions received, requiring for a major revision; 2020.07.03 Revised submission; 2020.07.19 Accepted. The overall speed in the journal is relatively fast, and the editorial office processes information quickly and efficiently. If it were not for myself to delay the revision, it would be faster! The quality of journal articles is quite good, and I hope its impact factor will increase year by year!

(10) Thank | xinxin321

I submitted an article last year, and I received the result of review in less than a month. I was given one month for revision. It was delayed for several days due to my own reasons. The manuscript was accepted on the same day that it was submitted. It took more than two months in total. I submitted another article on February 28 this year, the result of review was not given until May 7, and I was also given one month for revision. Since there were not many problems, I submitted the revised manuscript on May 21. But until now, there is no news. I'm waiting anxiously.

(0) Thank | J OK

Journal of the Science of and Agriculture. The first review lasted for 4 months after submission (uploaded on August 12). The intermediate status changed several times. It may be a new reviewer was found. Three experts reviewed the manuscript. We spent one month revising it. (The graduation thesis defense has delayed it for a few days.) It actually took one week. I returned the revision on January 10, and it was accepted on the same day. Now we are waiting for the copyright agreement to be signed. Dear friends, how long will the copyright agreement and proof be sent to me? Thanks to the almighty netizens. Thank you all~

(7) Thank | 霹雳阿亮

We submitted our paper in mid-September, and after making some revisions, it was accepted in late December. The reviewers are very efficient, and the reviewers’ opinions are very constructive.

(4) Thank | 张先生

Direct rejection after one month, citing reasons for the deadline, not suitable for their journal, editors really can drag it out.

(0) Thank | corbin

I emailed to inquire about the status, and the response was "the manuscript is with the editor for selecting reviewers". I'm so frustrated, it's been two months and it still hasn't been sent for review.

(0) Thank | cnpk

I have been submitting manuscripts for 5 months now, and what is most frustrating is that my article was originally classified as in the second division by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, but it has been moved to the third division.

(0) Thank | Pengpeng

10.10 submitted for review, under review on the same day, then received an email saying there was a mistake in the order of a table, so I made the correction and re-uploaded it.
On 1.18, the supervisor asked for a reminder.
On 1.21, it showed major revisions were needed. There was only one reviewer, and the questions raised were quite professional, which greatly improved the article.
On 2.18, the revisions were made as requested, and it was mentioned that the journal's impact factor for February had not been released yet.
On 3.25, it was accepted for publication.
I was quite happy to receive the acceptance email, as the wait had been quite long and I couldn't see the progress within the system. The journal is also a good one, and after checking the ranking, it has moved from a second tier to a third tier in the Chinese Academy of Sciences ranking. It's frustrating to see the pyramid ranking system, but from now on, I can list it as a Q1 ranking on my resume.

(0) Thank | 哈等等

I can choose not to charge. I submitted it in the second half of last year. It has now been officially published. The review process took about thirty days, and another ten days after revisions. I don't know if it's because I don't understand the submission website or what, but for this journal, it goes through the stages of submission, review, revision, final acceptance, online publication, and official publication. I had no idea where it was in the process during the entire submission period. Each time, I would suddenly check my email and find out it had moved to the next stage.

(0) Thank | qianxi

I dropped three districts unexpectedly.

(0) Thank | Anchovyyyy

Does this journal charge publication fees?

(0) Thank | ryz1998

Have you received your article now?

(0) Thank | cnpk

ME: Editorial Office, JSFA
ME: Assistant, Editorial
ME: [Name]
Under Review

Submitted on 2.27, reminded about email issue on 3.3, returned after revision. It has been in this status in the hands of the editor.

(0) Thank | 西瓜冰沙

ME: Editorial Office, JSFA
ME: Assistant, Editorial
ME: Barnett, Chloe
Submitted on January 24th, only just assigned to specific editor with a 3.4 rating, Under Review. I am unsure whether it will be sent for review with a capital "R" or a lowercase "r", as my previous submission in this status was rejected as not suitable. Will continue to update.

(0) Thank | 帅b

Excuse me, OP, is your status still Assistant, Editorial?

(0) Thank | cnpk

May I ask, are you still an Assistant, Editorial, OP?

(0) Thank | cnpk

I am in the same situation. I submitted on January 2nd and by mid-February, the editor completed the "under review" process, only to receive a desk reject stating that my title did not fit within the scope. I really don't understand what the status of this journal's review process is.

(0) Thank | 帅b

The Assistant Editorial should still be in the hands of the assistant editor, it hasn't been sent out yet.

(0) Thank | cnpk

I and you are in exactly the same situation. I submitted my work a few days before you did, and we have the same editor. Does this mean our works are being reviewed?

(0) Thank | 肖富容

Created 01-Feb-2025
Submitted 03-Feb-2025
ME: Editorial Office, JSFA
ME: Assistant, Editorial
ME: Brickell, Stephanie

Under Review

(0) Thank | cnpk

I think that seeing "Under Review" after the editor assignment in the ScholarOne system should mean that the manuscript has been sent for external review, but seeing "Under Review" in the Wiley new system does not necessarily mean the same, as a submission is automatically labeled as "Under Review" as soon as it is submitted.

(0) Thank | Arrival

ME: Editorial Office, JSFA
ME: Assistant, Editorial
ME: Name

Under Review
I do not understand if this is for review or if the editor is still considering it.

(0) Thank | 640

I submitted a non-OA article. It's really slow, with the status "Under Review" for nearly eight months after submission. Despite multiple reminders, it was of no use as the reviewers did not respond.

(0) Thank | Wynne~~

Is this journal chargeable?

(0) Thank | 钟媛媛zyy

Is this journal charging fees? The review process is extremely slow...

(0) Thank | zouzhiyong