7.13 submit to journal; 7.14 with editor; 7.19 with editor, assigned to editor in charge; 9.2 under review; 9.20 under review; 10.22 under editor evaluation; 11.2 compulsory minor revision; 11.17 submit revised manuscript; 11.22 under review; 12.2 required reviews completed; 12.3 accept. Editor is very responsible! The level of reviewers is very high! Thanks to European Ceramic Society!

(9) Thank | Clearlove

February 11th, submitted; February 13th, with editor; February 16th, assigned assistant editor; February 22nd, under review, and the time for the under review changed three times in the middle, which may due to not finding the reviewers; April 17th, under editor evaluation; April 19th, compulsory major revision, 2 months were given, with one reviewer; May 5th, submitted; May 6th, with editor; May 8th, under review; May 18th, Required reviews completed; May 21st, accept.

(4) Thank | rdl123

2020.1.13 Submission; 1.14 with editor; 1.21 the editor was changed, and it was under review soon after it was with editor; 2.20 First review comments returned. One reviewer gave very friendly comments and affirmed the innovativeness of the article. There were about 10 comments, which was of certain degree of difficulty and needed us to make a simple experiment, and he also mentioned that there were serious language issues. The editor also gave 6 comments that were not serious and it was easy to revise the manuscript. 4.14 It was delayed because of the epidemic, and the revised version was submitted one week before the deadline. During the period, it was polished by Elsevier and the certificate was attached with the submission. 4.18 It was sent back by the technical editor twice, and we felt so terrible, but fortunately it was successfully under review; 5.1 required reviews completed; 5.3 accept. The editor and reviewers are very friendly. This is the first article after three years of PhD. Thanks to Journal of the European Ceramic Society, and I wish it better and better!

(7) Thank | sulcast

The quality of this article has greatly improved from 2008 to 2012. The editor and reviewers are very professional. I submitted a paper before, and it was rejected after 1.5 years. I submitted another paper recently, and it was reviewed for more than two months. I made the revisions and the editor accepted it directly.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

Has there been any changes?

(0) Thank | banzhuangong07

25 May 2025 Completed - Accept

After encountering a difficult reviewer last time, I replied this time and the editor accepted it without sending it for review. I was quite angry before, but the editor has been looking for reviewers throughout this process, and the handling was relatively timely. I realized that I have never complained about the editor, so the boomerang did not hit me.

(0) Thank | RandomG

Recently, I collaborated with a friend on an article that combines theory and experiments. I was responsible for the calculations, while he handled the experiments. The review process took a little over a month, and after some major revisions, it took another month to complete the revisions and resubmit. In total, it took about three months, which is considered relatively fast. The journal has a good reputation, and if the work is done carefully and meticulously, they are generally friendly towards submissions from relatively unknown authors like us.

(0) Thank | Automata

The reviewer asked me to change "farther" to "farer", a bit abstract, not much to say, it will become unfortunate, submitting manuscripts should be cautious, the temperature is rising, ready to self-destruct reply. Who have I been feeding for the past six months, see you again if fate allows.

(0) Thank | RandomG

天坑啊，大修返稿后审稿人全跑路了，现在重新找了三个审稿人，没一个接受的，去年年底到现在，第二轮全新的审稿，论文又重生了

Oh no, after the major revisions, all the reviewers disappeared. Now we have found three new reviewers, but none of them have accepted. From the end of last year until now, a completely new round of review has begun, and the paper has been reborn.

(1) Thank | RandomG

The reviewers are quite fast, but the editor is too slow. My manuscript has been sent to the associate editor. Oh my, it's been two weeks since the reviewers' comments came back, but the associate editor hasn't responded at all. Maybe they don't like my work.

(0) Thank | Zero-研

28 Apr 2025 Under Review.

(0) Thank | RandomG

22 Apr 2025 submit the revised manuscript
23 Apr 2025 With Editor

(0) Thank | RandomG

I hope this journal comes out soon.

(0) Thank | 窄巷与梦

It has been almost a month, is that normal?

(0) Thank | 郝书进

2024.10.15 submitted
2024.11.01 with editor
2024.11.30 under review (reviewer 1#)
2025.01.03 under review (reviewer 2#)
2025.03.24 under review

(0) Thank | mjoy

Whether it is the first district or the second district, JAC is dominating and we can't advance.

(0) Thank | Chong

Has it been upgraded to level 1 in the 2025 version?

(0) Thank | ZHT0508

The reviewers are very professional and the editing process is also very efficient.

(0) Thank | Iwater

12.30 submit
1.12 under review
1.30 major revision
3.10 resubmit the revised manuscript
3.17 accept

(0) Thank | Iwater

2024.02.11-With Editor
2024.02.16-With Editor
2024.03.01-With Editor
2024.03.04-Under Review

(1) Thank | gddifcjbdsjov

Why did yours get accepted after WE? Mine went through major revisions, and after uploading the revised draft, it still shows as WE, now it's UR... The assigned editor is a bit slow TAT.

(0) Thank | Lays1028

28 Feb 2025 Compulsory Major Revision The reviewers are attacking like crazy.

(0) Thank | RandomG

26 Feb 2025 Under Review (Reviewer invited)

(0) Thank | RandomG

2.22 Major Renovation

(0) Thank | 好运来好运来aaa

Required reviews completed by 2 reviewers on 21 Feb 2025.

(0) Thank | RandomG