My article is about analytical solution. It’s similar to the experience of the 17th poster. It was submitted in October, and the subject editor held it in his hands for more than a month without sending it for review. As a result, I was told that it was not innovative enough and it was rejected, and then sent me a literature in 2020, saying that my article was no different from it. How ridiculous! I read that article a long time ago. They used the finite difference method to solve nonlinear problems. What does it have to do with my analytical solution to linear problems? The editor didn't read it at all. Did you pick out two or three keywords from the manuscript and search them directly in Google Scholar, and fool me with the first result? After being rejected, I resubmitted it again at the end of November, and reiterated some innovation in the comments to editor. As a result, it was relentlessly suppressed for more than a month without being sent for review. It is estimated that it has been assigned to the same editor again. What a really bad luck... By the way, the subject editor is Patrick Sean Keogh from the University of Bath in UK. I hope you will be careful. :)

(140) Thank | TX_NUAA

Mar. 14 2019, submitted to journal; Mar. 24 2019, with editor; Apr. 22 2019, under review; Jun. 19 2019, under editor evaluation; Jun. 22 2019, major revision; Aug. 08 2019, revision submitted; Aug. 09 2019, under review; Oct. 16 2019, minor revision; Oct. 29 2019, revision submitted; Oct. 30 2019, with editor; Nov. 02 2019, accepted.

(2) Thank | Yuejian

20190417 Submission; 20190422 Editor assignations; 20190427 Reject pre review, resubmission possible; 20190502 Resubmission; 20190508 Editor assignations; 20190529 Review; 20190628 Under Editor Evaluation; 20190719 Under Editor Evaluation; 20190731 Rejection. I submitted to ultrasonic motor modeling. The editor gave several small errors including formulas in the first review. Five reviewers were assigned, and they gave about 30 comments, including the core issues of the paper. Two reviewers gave rejection comments, and it was finally rejected. The editor was serious and responsible, the review was professional and rigorous, and parts of the comments have a great effect on the article.

(3) Thank | LamYuyeung

This journal publishes a large number of papers. This journal is controlled by the British, and it places greater emphasis on theory in vibration. I have submitted to Structural Dynamics in the past. The journals, such as EESD and JFS, recently wanted me to select JSV, but my papers were unfairly rejected. The reason for the rejection was that the editor had previously published papers in the same research direction in other journals (EESD and JFS) and did not accept submissions. Very strange. This journal has a portal view.

(62) Thank | LAOLI2015

Will JSV require program and raw data to be provided?

(0) Thank | bsw

Please translate the following passage into English: 2025/8/4 accept

(0) Thank | W.

1st trial: 6 months and 10 days
2nd trial: 1 month whole

(0) Thank | Kevin Z

2025.07.23 Minor revision returned

What journal are you submitting to now, pay my respects

(0) Thank | Kevin Z

Hey guys, have any of you submitted the Author Checklist file before? How do we go about it? Do we just need to check each item and then tick it off?

(0) Thank | 萧—

It is unlikely, and slowly no one is submitting to this journal anymore. Besides, the quality of the papers is not very good now, and there are too many relationship papers. My teacher used to submit a lot to JSV, but now he has blacklisted it. It's sad, and it's not possible to submit to the same journal as those relationship papers.

(0) Thank | 匿名用户##

I'm not sure. The editor has not invited any new reviewers either.

(0) Thank | zzzzz1sd

Did it change back to UR because there were conflicting opinions from the previous reviewers?

(0) Thank | 齐稀古

Excuse me, did it go directly from RRC to UR? Is there a With editor status? I have been in RRC for a long time too.

(0) Thank | 萧—

It has become UR, but there is also no invitation to reviewers.

(0) Thank | zzzzz1sd

Has RRC received any updates? I am at the same stage and feeling really scared.

(0) Thank | 齐稀古

Has the OP received any news from RRC? Mine has also reached RRC, and I am feeling really scared.

(0) Thank | 齐稀古

Is there any news now? How long has it been since RRC?

(0) Thank | Ruibo Wang

Not bad.

(0) Thank | Ruibo Wang

Not bad.

(0) Thank | Ruibo Wang

It has been over a month since the RRC, and the editor has not yet dealt with it.

(0) Thank | zzzzz1sd

Great journal, the speed of handling by the editors and reviewers is very fast.

(1) Thank | W.

I submitted in May this year and it's only just under review now. I feel like this journal is a bit slow this year.

(0) Thank | 齐稀古

Why has it been in "submitted to journal" status for the past 20 days? Are others experiencing the same issue?

(0) Thank | li_xiao

I consider the field of vibration that I am researching as my white moonlight. The first time I submitted it to the editor, it was rejected, but they provided feedback and indicated that I could resubmit. I have now made revisions and resubmitted it, and it is back in the hands of the editor. I hope it will be accepted this time!

(0) Thank | MhSilver

How long did the final review take?

(0) Thank | 明之cdx