The editor of this journal is particularly responsible. The submitted manuscript will be first reviewed by the editor, and they will even help you correct the grammatical errors in the text and mark them. This will help increase the speed of external review. Then for the external review, the submitted manuscript will be sent to the reviewer in about 2 to 3 days, and the reviewer will reply quickly. The total process lasted for 89 days, with one major revision and two minor revisions being made.

(1) Thank | star

The article was submitted on July 1; The comments of the two reviewers were received on September 1; The email was received on September 2, and it was returned to the reviewers after revision. During the period, it took a long time to invite the reviewers, and the actual review time was quite short. One month was given for the revision. The revised manuscript was actually resubmitted on September 14. The editor returned it to the reviewers on the next day. The comments of the two reviewers were received on September 22, and it was accepted. The acceptance letter was received on September 24. Summary: The review was fast, but the process of inviting the reviewers was really too slow. The editor processed the article very fast, and it was basically processed on the next day. The editor was nice, and it was worthy of submission.

(7) Thank | 12580小灰灰

It took about 90 days to find a reviewer and examine the draft. The process moved much faster after the second reviewer. There are no substantial problems in the two major overhauls, that is, some explanations were added. I found a language polishing service to resolve the grammatical issues, and then the paper was accepted.

(0) Thank | 真RAY

Have you submitted yours for review? What is your reference number? Mine has been in editor review for over 50 days.

(0) Thank | Timehh

The processing speed is slow in the beginning, but it gets better towards the end. If you have plenty of time, you can wait a bit longer.

(0) Thank | 小二11

How are things going now? I have been editing for forty-five days, how about you? What is your reference number?

(0) Thank | Timehh

I have been editing that for two months.

(0) Thank | 请回答2024

Did you receive an email asking to select key terms? I received an email yesterday asking to select key terms. Does this mean it's ready for submission soon? Mine has been in editing for almost 20 days.

(0) Thank | Timehh

Did you send an email to choose key terms? I received an email yesterday asking me to choose key terms. Is it going to be submitted for review soon? Mine has been in editing for almost 20 days.

(1) Thank | Timehh

Still looking for reviewers, this journal is moving too slowly.

(0) Thank | 小二11

What's the situation now? I have been waiting for half a month and it still shows in the editing section.

(0) Thank | Timehh

After the major revision, it took twenty days for it to become "Decision Letter Being Prepared." What does this status mean for five or six days?

(0) Thank | 哪吒1

After the repair, it has been about five or six days since it changed to "Decision Letter Being Prepared" status. What's going on with this?

(0) Thank | 哪吒1

Is there a follow-up?!

(0) Thank | 急急急pp

Not this journal, wrong place for comments, haha.

(0) Thank | xdlovejj

No comments.

(0) Thank | xdlovejj

It's been over three months and it still hasn't been submitted for review. The question is, are we still looking for reviewers? Feeling like throwing up. Anyone else experiencing the same thing?

(1) Thank | 小二11

Please stop submitting to this journal. It is a garbage journal. They need to seriously revise and resubmit. The second reviewer and editor Gerardo Diaz are completely irresponsible. The comments provided by the second reviewer for revisions are exactly the same as the comments provided during the first revision, indicating that they didn't even look at the revised manuscript or response letter. Only the first reviewer was responsible and serious. This kind of garbage journal can be submitted to anyone who likes it. I wish this associate editor and the second reviewer will be treated the same way by other experts in the future. It's a waste of my four months.

(0) Thank | 西瓜冰

The review process is too slow.

(0) Thank | adam251

How is it going behind? Have you been hired?

(0) Thank | 虎娃2宝贝

Buddy, can you tell me how long you have been waiting?

(0) Thank | 小二11

I was rejected, so I decided to switch to AIP advance.

(0) Thank | Thanos

The Pure Pure Journal of Harm.

(0) Thank | 小二11

It's been two months since I submitted it, and there has been no response. After sending an email, the editor asked me to continue waiting. I'm really fed up.

(0) Thank | 小二11

Me too!!!

(0) Thank | 急急急pp