The editor of this journal is particularly responsible. The submitted manuscript will be first reviewed by the editor, and they will even help you correct the grammatical errors in the text and mark them. This will help increase the speed of external review. Then for the external review, the submitted manuscript will be sent to the reviewer in about 2 to 3 days, and the reviewer will reply quickly. The total process lasted for 89 days, with one major revision and two minor revisions being made.

(1) Thank | star

The article was submitted on July 1; The comments of the two reviewers were received on September 1; The email was received on September 2, and it was returned to the reviewers after revision. During the period, it took a long time to invite the reviewers, and the actual review time was quite short. One month was given for the revision. The revised manuscript was actually resubmitted on September 14. The editor returned it to the reviewers on the next day. The comments of the two reviewers were received on September 22, and it was accepted. The acceptance letter was received on September 24. Summary: The review was fast, but the process of inviting the reviewers was really too slow. The editor processed the article very fast, and it was basically processed on the next day. The editor was nice, and it was worthy of submission.

(7) Thank | 12580小灰灰

It took about 90 days to find a reviewer and examine the draft. The process moved much faster after the second reviewer. There are no substantial problems in the two major overhauls, that is, some explanations were added. I found a language polishing service to resolve the grammatical issues, and then the paper was accepted.

(0) Thank | 真RAY

Not this journal, wrong place for comments, haha.

(0) Thank | xdlovejj

No comments.

(0) Thank | xdlovejj

It's been over three months and it still hasn't been submitted for review. The question is, are we still looking for reviewers? Feeling like throwing up. Anyone else experiencing the same thing?

(1) Thank | 小二11

Please stop submitting to this journal. It is a garbage journal. They need to seriously revise and resubmit. The second reviewer and editor Gerardo Diaz are completely irresponsible. The comments provided by the second reviewer for revisions are exactly the same as the comments provided during the first revision, indicating that they didn't even look at the revised manuscript or response letter. Only the first reviewer was responsible and serious. This kind of garbage journal can be submitted to anyone who likes it. I wish this associate editor and the second reviewer will be treated the same way by other experts in the future. It's a waste of my four months.

(0) Thank | 西瓜冰

The review process is too slow.

(0) Thank | adam251

How is it going behind? Have you been hired?

(0) Thank | 虎娃2宝贝

Buddy, can you tell me how long you have been waiting?

(0) Thank | 小二11

I was rejected, so I decided to switch to AIP advance.

(0) Thank | Thanos

The Pure Pure Journal of Harm.

(0) Thank | 小二11

It's been two months since I submitted it, and there has been no response. After sending an email, the editor asked me to continue waiting. I'm really fed up.

(0) Thank | 小二11

Me too!!!

(0) Thank | 急急急pp

Associate Editor Assigned 28-Mar-2025 15:35:03

(0) Thank | Thanos

Finding reviewers is relatively slow. The paper went through major and minor revisions for a total of over 7 months before being accepted.

(0) Thank | 学爸

Isn't this harmful? It's been so long.

(0) Thank | Thanos

I have been reviewing for half a month, and there are many comments on the manuscript.

(0) Thank | Thanos

Submitted in mid-November 2024, accepted at the end of February 2025, the process was quite fast. After the article was published, the publication did not provide the author with the full text. Does anyone know how to contact the editorial office to request the full text?

(0) Thank | 悲伤的牛牛

The search for reviewers has been ongoing for one and a half months and we still have not found any. Has anyone else experienced a similar situation?

(0) Thank | 炒蛋不+番茄

The manuscript was revised once and took 214 days from submission to acceptance. One of the reviewers took longer than the other. There were a total of two reviewers for my submission.

(0) Thank | SUDA0107

2024.7.01 Submission
2024.7.25 Under external review (first reviewer)
2024.8.10 Under external review (first reviewer's comments returned)
2024.8.23 Under external review (second reviewer)
2024.9.03 Under external review (second reviewer's comments returned)
2024.9.05 Review comments returned: Major revisions
2024.9.18 Revision
2024.9.29 Second review
2024.10.19 Accepted

(0) Thank | 姜家小宇宙

I am also in Associate Editor Assigned status, and it has been 14 days.

(0) Thank | 悲伤的牛牛

How long is the submission period for this journal, how long does it take to review, and have there been any results?

(1) Thank | redandred

Hello, I am also in the same situation. May I ask if you have any updates?

(0) Thank | yang